Quoting W. Martin Borgert (deba...@debian.org):
> On 2009-03-21 07:44, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Martin, I think the proposed schedule is OK.
>
> It's now published here:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1#ReleaseNotesSchedule
THanks.
I add dle to the list of CC. I t
Paul Wise schrieb:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
It's another instance of duplication - why retain the long description
in the Packages file while a translated version also exists from DDTP?
Probably better for the description to be removed from the Packages
file comp
On 2009-03-21 07:44, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Martin, I think the proposed schedule is OK.
It's now published here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1#ReleaseNotesSchedule
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Dear Debian I18N people
I'm currently not subscribed to the debian-i18n list, so please keep
me on Cc on replies directly to this mail, please.
I would like to ask if someone would be interested in translate the
small package giplet. So far it has only a translation in zh_CN done
directly by the
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> It's another instance of duplication - why retain the long description
> in the Packages file while a translated version also exists from DDTP?
> Probably better for the description to be removed from the Packages
> file completely and the D
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:28:36 +0900
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>
> > The extended description needs to be available to APT, not only via
> > packages.d.o.
>
> I agree with Neil William's comment in the other thread about removing
> long descripti
6 matches
Mail list logo
