[RFC] wiki.debian.orgTranslation Namespace

2008-01-12 Thread Franklin PIAT
Hello, Choosing a naming scheme for the translated pages on wiki.d.o is probably as old as Debian wiki itself. Currently many scheme coexists. I've attempted to summarised the previous discussions : A list of propositions, some criteria, etc. The Pros and Cons are based on the discussions, the ob

Re: [RFC] Translation Namespace Policy.

2008-01-12 Thread Franklin PIAT
Hello, On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 23:12 -0200, Javier Di Mauro wrote: > Is it possible to do >> wiki.debian.org/fr/Materiel ?? I think it's > better than the others. We can... But it raise a maintenance problem : If a new non-english page is created, but the author doesn't "connect" the page to t

Re: [RFC] Translation Namespace (was WikiVote)

2008-01-12 Thread Franklin PIAT
Salokine On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 11:39 +0100, Salokine wrote: > 3 days remaining and only ... 1 vote. It's too early to get people to "Vote". We need advices/comments first. I post an RFC tonight. > Please we need your opinion. Definitely, we do. Franklin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Re: [WikiVote] Translation Namespace Policy 3 days remaining

2008-01-12 Thread Javier Di Mauro
Hi, Is it possible to do >> wiki.debian.org/fr/Materiel ?? I think it's better than the others. Regards! Javier. 2008/1/12, Salokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > 3 days remaining and only ... 1 vote. > > Please we need your opinion. > > Vote start 05/01/2008 and will finished 15/01/2008 >

[WikiVote] Translation Namespace Policy 3 days remaining

2008-01-12 Thread Salokine
Hi, 3 days remaining and only ... 1 vote. Please we need your opinion. Vote start 05/01/2008 and will finished 15/01/2008 Best regards. Salokine. Le Saturday 05 January 2008 22:11:32 Salokine, vous avez écrit : > Hi, > > We are working on Translation Namespace on wiki.debian.org and we need yo

Re: Bits from the Debian i18n Meeting (Extremadura 2007)

2008-01-12 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Friday 11 January 2008 22:06, Jens Seidel wrote: > > * Generation of Compendium PO files per-language > A good idea but it is restricted to to a fixed license, right? Otherwise > it would be hard to use the compendium if multiple (possibly conflicting > ones) would all apply. The compendi