Re: Status of the belocs-locales-{bin,data} packages

2007-04-15 Thread Christian Perrier
> > I think that your question should include the glibc maintainers, > > however I share your feelings. There is no point in maintaining > > belocs-* packages nowunless it again becomes difficult to include > > new locales in glibc. > > We basically agree to include locales fixes in the glibc

Re: Status of the belocs-locales-{bin,data} packages

2007-04-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Christian Perrier a écrit : > (keeping belocs-locales-* packages) > >> Does anybody want to maintain these packages? >> Are there some languages which really need them? > > > Not in D-I supported packages. > > I think that your question should include the glibc maintainers, > however I share yo

debconf PO translations for the package firebird2.0

2007-04-15 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Dear Debian I18N people, I would like to know if some of you would be interested in translating firebird2.0. firebird2.0 already includes bg.po bn.po cs.po de.po es.po fr.po hi.po ko.po lt.po ms.po nb.po pt.po ro.po sv.po vi.po. So do not translate it to these languages (the translators will be

Review in progress for tzdata debconf templates

2007-04-15 Thread Christian Perrier
The debian-l10n-english team will soon begin the review of the debconf templates for this package. This increases the probability for changes to the templates. As a consequence, translation work on this package's templates is discouraged. It would even make the reviewer work more complicated. As

Re: Status of the belocs-locales-{bin,data} packages

2007-04-15 Thread Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
Hello, 15 04 2007 о 04:10 +0200 Nicolas François написав(-ла): > They are not currently actively maintained, and IIRC, they were useful > when it was very difficult to introduce new locales in the locales package > (I don't think it is still the case, am I wrong?), to test new > locales before sub

Re: Status of the belocs-locales-{bin,data} packages

2007-04-15 Thread Christian Perrier
(keeping belocs-locales-* packages) > Does anybody want to maintain these packages? > Are there some languages which really need them? Not in D-I supported packages. I think that your question should include the glibc maintainers, however I share your feelings. There is no point in maintaining

Re: Updated it release-notes translation (1.287)

2007-04-15 Thread Jens Seidel
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 01:44:15AM +0200, Luca Brivio wrote: > Last patch for italian release-notes is attached. Thanks, committed. > Please notice me if this isn't the appropriate place where to send it. :-) There is nothing wrong sending it to this list even thought I would expect it on debian