Re: [g-i] new screenshots available

2006-06-24 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/24/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 07:01:14AM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote: > Hmm.. TSCu_Paranar is the font which I use in my Debian box and dont > have any problem with it. Also there was a screenshot sent when Tamil > was announced a supported lan

Re: [g-i] new screenshots available

2006-06-24 Thread Davide Viti
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 07:01:14AM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote: > Hmm.. TSCu_Paranar is the font which I use in my Debian box and dont > have any problem with it. Also there was a screenshot sent when Tamil > was announced a supported language. The tamil font rendering in that > screenshot

Re: [g-i] new screenshots available

2006-06-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 24 June 2006 16:44, Davide Viti wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:16:03PM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote: > > Tamil characters are not shown properly :-(. What is the font used > > for Tamil (ta)? > > TSCu_Paranar contained in ttf-tamil-fonts. > What is wrong with it? > Can you s

Re: [g-i] new screenshots available

2006-06-24 Thread Damodharan Rajalingam
Hmm.. TSCu_Paranar is the font which I use in my Debian box and dont have any problem with it. Also there was a screenshot sent when Tamil was announced a supported language. The tamil font rendering in that screenshot was fine. Is it because of font stripping? Can we try with unstipped font?DamuOn

Re: [g-i] new screenshots available

2006-06-24 Thread Davide Viti
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:16:03PM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote: > Tamil characters are not shown properly :-(. What is the font used for Tamil > (ta)? TSCu_Paranar contained in ttf-tamil-fonts. What is wrong with it? Can you suggest any alternatives? Davide signature.asc Description:

Re: [g-i] new screenshots available

2006-06-24 Thread Davide Viti
Hi Jamil, On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:46:45PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote: > >> Which version are you using? > > > >Version: 20060501cvs-2 > >we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory > >footprint > > By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-) I replaced the st