Re: console-data: planned translation NMU

2006-01-27 Thread Christian Perrier
> svn propdel svn:executable vi.po Done > > Please ensure that your ~/.subversion/config doesn't contain something > like > > *.po = svn:eol-style=native;svn:executable > > in the [auto-props] section. Nope. No idea where this comes from. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Re: console-data: planned translation NMU

2006-01-27 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 28/01/2006, at 10:27 AM, Jens Seidel wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:36:16AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: As written to its maintainer 2 days ago, I plan a translation NMU for console-data. The folowiong are complete and require no action: ,uk ,vi ,zh_CN That's not true. The Vietna

Re: console-data: planned translation NMU

2006-01-27 Thread Jens Seidel
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:36:16AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > As written to its maintainer 2 days ago, I plan a translation NMU > for console-data. > > The folowiong are complete and require no action: > > ,uk ,vi ,zh_CN That's not true. The Vietnamese file is marked executable. Christia

Re: http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/ popularity sorting?

2006-01-27 Thread Jacob Sparre Andersen
Denis Barbier wrote: At the moment, only one sorting order is allowed for all materials, and fixing that may be quite hard, http://people.debian.org/~barbier/intl/l10n/unstable/ If you prefer this sorting order, I will grab by_vote instead of by_inst, please have a look and let me know. I

Re: http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/ popularity sorting?

2006-01-27 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:24:57AM +0100, Claus Hindsgaul wrote: > I just noted that the sorting is apparently based on the INSTALLED > number of packages. This makes perfectly sense for the debconf > translations, since this is an approximate measure for, how many times > the translations will be

Re: http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/ popularity sorting?

2006-01-27 Thread Jacob Sparre Andersen
Claus Hindsgaul wrote: But how about the program translations? One could argue that it would make more sense to sort/prioritize the translations after how often a program is executed, since that would be an approximate measure of how often the translation is shown to a user. What do you th

Re: http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/ popularity sorting?

2006-01-27 Thread Claus Hindsgaul
I just noted that the sorting is apparently based on the INSTALLED number of packages. This makes perfectly sense for the debconf translations, since this is an approximate measure for, how many times the translations will be shown (of course depending on the question priority). But how about the