Re: new strings for deborphan

2004-07-12 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 05:07:22PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've made the necessary changes so that the orphaner shell script which > > is part of deborphan can be translated too. > > > > A tarball, extracted tarba

Re: new strings for deborphan

2004-07-12 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 05:07:22PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Hi, > > I've made the necessary changes so that the orphaner shell script which > is part of deborphan can be translated too. > > A tarball, extracted tarball and svn repos are at > http://deborphan.alioth.debian.org/deborphan_1.7

Re: yes_key/no_key in aptitude.pot

2004-07-12 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 07:28:12AM +0200, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > I have seen the appearance of "yes_key" and "no_key" in the > aptitude.pot file. I guessed this is for us translators to put the > appropriate key for Y/N choices. > > Putting some warning to trans

yes_key/no_key in aptitude.pot

2004-07-12 Thread Christian Perrier
Hi daniel, I have seen the appearance of "yes_key" and "no_key" in the aptitude.pot file. I guessed this is for us translators to put the appropriate key for Y/N choices. Putting some warning to translators in the POT file explaining they're supposed to put the usual keys for "Yes" and "No" in th