Re: Bug#215647: [patch] xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n

2003-10-17 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#215647: [patch] xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:52:47 -0500 > It was an upstream decision which I elected to respect. Ok, I understand that you don't think there are any technical problem on my patch. You think t

Re: Bug#215647: [patch] xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n

2003-10-17 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:52:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: [...] > The bug submitter had already contacted the upstream maintainer of > XTerm, and the patches had been rejected by him. Apparently, the > submitter's goal was to get Debian to fork from upstream after the exact > same change h

Re: Bug#215647: [patch] xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n

2003-10-17 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:14:31PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > You should have requested to tag it directly "wontfix", you would have saved > yourself some work ;) Or was the discussion with upstream done in the > meantime? Yes, discussion was done with upstream in the meantime. > I also fail

Re: [patch] xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n

2003-10-17 Thread Martin Quinson
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 11:22:06AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: > Hi, > > From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [patch] xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n > Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:44:21 -0500 > > > Please file a bug and tag it "experimental". > > Ok, I did. You should have request