Bug#802127: crosshurd: GNU/Hurd fails to install with crosshurd

2015-10-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
raphael, le Sat 17 Oct 2015 18:40:23 +0200, a écrit : > Les paquets suivants contiennent des dépendances non satisfaites : > initscripts : Dépend: sysvinit-utils (>= 2.88dsf-50) mais ne sera pas > installé > Casse: util-linux (< 2.26.2-4~) mais 2.25.2-4.1+hurd.1 devra > être inst

Re: licensing of intloop() in libddekit/interrupt.c

2015-11-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Robert Millan, on Tue 10 Nov 2015 21:54:36 +0100, wrote: > El 10/11/15 a les 14:24, Antti Kantee ha escrit: > > On 08/11/15 20:39, Robert Millan wrote: > >> El 08/11/15 a les 20:45, Da Zheng ha escrit: > >>> Hello Robert, > >>> > >>> Sure, I have no problem with the license. > >> > >> Excellent! >

Re: ghc build failed

2015-12-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Sun 06 Dec 2015 12:17:17 +0100, wrote: > The latest ghc (7.10) failed to build, we'd need investigation there to > fix it. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ghc&arch=hurd-i386&ver=7.10.3-2&stamp=1449283137 (7.10.2 built fine,

ghc build failed

2015-12-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, The latest ghc (7.10) failed to build, we'd need investigation there to fix it. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ghc&arch=hurd-i386&ver=7.10.3-2&stamp=1449283137 Samuel

Re: ghc build failed

2015-12-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Sun 06 Dec 2015 12:18:13 +0100, wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Sun 06 Dec 2015 12:17:17 +0100, wrote: > > The latest ghc (7.10) failed to build, we'd need investigation there to > > fix it. > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg

Re: ghc build failed

2015-12-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, on Thu 10 Dec 2015 12:28:46 +0100, wrote: > On 06/12/15 22:51, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Samuel Thibault, on Sun 06 Dec 2015 12:18:13 +0100, wrote: > >> Samuel Thibault, on Sun 06 Dec 2015 12:17:17 +0100, wrote: > >>> The latest ghc (7.

Re: GCC Preprocessor directives for GNU/Hurd?

2015-12-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Roger Shimizu, on Thu 17 Dec 2015 22:39:18 +0900, wrote: > it's safe for most common application to treat __GLIBC__ > as "Yes" for Linux and Hurd. It's yes when the libc being used is glibc. On linux with uclibc for instance, it wouldn't be defined. So depending on what feature exactly you want to

Re: Bug#760275: e2fsprogs: e2fsck corrupts Hurd filesystems

2015-12-31 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Theodore Ts'o, on Wed 30 Dec 2015 23:56:46 -0500, wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 07:41:10PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote: > > > > > > > since we have a bunch of workarounds > > > > keyed off of that, and your patch will add another --- and I'm > > > > planning on adding still more to make

rsyslog testsuite issues

2016-01-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, I've dug a bit the rsyslog "illegal instruction" issue. It just happened that __sigreturn was returning (and thus the trampoline firewall triggered) because unmaskable signals were masked. This is now fixed in libpthread, I will push to the debian glibc package. Samuel

Re: rsyslog testsuite issues

2016-01-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Sun 03 Jan 2016 04:22:20 +0100, wrote: > This is now fixed in libpthread, I will push to the debian glibc > package. I have put a patched 2.21-6 libpthread on https://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/libpthread-2.21.so Samuel

Re: qtbase build failure (IPV6_RECVPKTINFO, IPV6_RECVHOPLIMIT)

2016-01-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Dmitry Shachnev, on Sun 03 Jan 2016 20:36:28 +0300, wrote: > socket/qnativesocketengine_unix.cpp:211:17: error: 'IPV6_RECVPKTINFO' was > not declared in this scope > socket/qnativesocketengine_unix.cpp:226:17: error: 'IPV6_RECVHOPLIMIT' was > not declared in this scope > > > http://code.q

Re: PATCH: Hurd FTBFS with perl 5.22

2016-01-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Mon 04 Jan 2016 22:02:02 +0100, wrote: > - @val = @{$canned_values{$hz}}; > - if (!defined(@val)) { > - @val = compute_values($hz); > - } > + @val = compute_values($hz); Don't we want to still try to use canned_values? Samuel

Re: PATCH: Hurd FTBFS with perl 5.22

2016-01-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Mon 04 Jan 2016 23:09:00 +0100, wrote: > On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 22:50 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, on Mon 04 Jan 2016 22:02:02 +0100, wrote: > > > - @val = @{$canned_values{$hz}}; > > > - if (!defined(@val)) { > > >

Re: PATCH: Hurd FTBFS with perl 5.22

2016-01-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
James Clarke, on Mon 04 Jan 2016 22:38:28 +, wrote: > > - if (!defined(@val)) { > > + if (!@val) { Applied, thanks! Samuel

Re: PATCH: Hurd FTBFS with perl 5.22

2016-01-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Tue 05 Jan 2016 08:30:51 +0100, wrote: > On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:36 +1100, William ML Leslie wrote: > > On 5 January 2016 at 16:56, Svante Signell wrote: > > > BTW: Why does Hurd contain such crappy dependencies such as perl. Is this > > > part > > > of upstream or Debian speci

Re: PATCH: Hurd FTBFS with perl 5.22

2016-01-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Tue 05 Jan 2016 14:49:40 +0100, wrote: > On 5 Jan 2016 13:27, "Samuel Thibault" <[1]samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > > > Well, the source is from the Hurd package, not netdde. It's in  > > > hurd_0.7.orig-libdde-linux26.tar.bz

Re: PATCH: Hurd FTBFS with perl 5.22

2016-01-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Guillem Jover, on Wed 06 Jan 2016 03:25:27 +0100, wrote: > $ apt-cache show perl-base|grep Essential > Essential: yes > $ apt-cache show perl|grep Essential > Build-Essential: yes Ah, I was wondering. I knew that perl was not essential, but didn't know perl was build-essential. Anyway, it's point

Re: PATCH: Hurd FTBFS with perl 5.22

2016-01-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Wed 06 Jan 2016 10:00:57 +0100, wrote: > (Samuel, how's the sound and USB presentation progressing for FOSDEM > 2016?) Hasn't progressed so far. Way too many other things to do with short deadlines. Samuel

Re: X11 setup

2016-01-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Riccardo Mottola, on Wed 06 Jan 2016 22:55:32 +0100, wrote: > is there a current guide for a X11 setup? On the Hurd port pages, simply. http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/hurd-install Samuel

gdb FTBFS

2016-01-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, The rebuild of the gdb package failed: mawk: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/gdb/reply_mig_hack.awk: line 98: regular expression compile failed (missing operand) I don't know awk enough to have any idea what's happening here. Samuel

Re: Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

2016-01-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Could somebody have a look? Thanks, Samuel Thorsten Alteholz, on Thu 16 Jul 2015 23:13:52 +0200, wrote: > Package: gnumach > Version: 2:1.5+git20150704-1 > Severity: serious > > please add all missing licenses to your debian/copyright. At least I found > files under: > MPL (linux/pcmcia

Re: virtio support

2016-02-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 19:09:49 +0530, wrote: > Does the current state of Debian GNU/HUrd support virtio drivers ? No, the emulated devices work fine for now, we haven't taken the time to write virtio drivers. Samuel

Re: virtio support

2016-02-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 23:24:30 +0530, wrote: > When you say "emulated devices work fine", is it as in they kinda work > ? They just work. > Sorry. I ask this because I have my Debian GNU/Hurd setup, that at > times, just breaks apart during upgrades. What are the symptoms? There

Re: virtio support

2016-02-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 23:33:53 +0530, wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 23:24 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > In today's upgrade, 2 observations I have that I'd like to share. > > > > 1) I'm using the rtl8139 network driver emulated with qemu. I fetched > > some data (around 200 M

Re: virtio support

2016-02-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 19:09:48 +0100, wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 23:33:53 +0530, wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 23:24 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > In today's upgrade, 2 observations I have that I'd like to share. > >

Re: virtio support

2016-02-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 23:54:15 +0530, wrote: > Since you asked about memory, I've now increased it to 2048. I think > for historical reasons, I had kept it to 1048 till now. 1024 should be plenty already. Samuel

Re: virtio support

2016-02-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 00:18:27 +0530, wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 19:32 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 23:54:15 +0530, wrote: > > > Since you asked about memory, I've now increased it to 2048. I > > think &g

Re: virtio support

2016-02-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 00:34:17 +0530, wrote: > Trying to ssh into the Hurd VM hangs. When trying to SSH connect, in > the Guest, the CPU tops to 70%+ I have never seen that. > Then, there's another interesting bug with networking. The first > attempt to restart the network fails.

Re: virtio support

2016-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Flávio Cruz, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 13:22:06 +0100, wrote: > I've seen that happen before, where the login program just loops indefinitely. > To fix it, and avoid reverting to a snapshot, I simply mount the qemu image as > a regular partition on the host system and then fsck it. What does get fixed by

Re: virtio support

2016-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Just to moderate this so people don't get a wrong idea. Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 17:23:11 +0530, wrote: > The state of Debian GNU/Hurd is still painful. I haven't reinstalled my boxes for *years*, keeping them up to date etc. So there must be something in your setup which makes the s

Re: virtio support

2016-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 18:18:18 +0530, wrote: > I can't really understand why there are 76 procs for /hurd/term Probably some program simply ran ls /dev, which thus triggers terms. But that's really not a problem, that doesn't consume too much memory or CPU. > More than that, in th

Re: virtio support

2016-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 18:23:29 +0530, wrote: > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 13:49 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > So yesterday, after I reported to you about the SSH issue, the OS > > was > > > hung on the sshd process. It couldn't even terminate th

Re: virtio support

2016-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 18:44:29 +0530, wrote: > When you say plain kvm, I'm assuming you're on the same as I am. > > rrs@learner:/var/tmp/hurd$ dpkg -S `which kvm` > qemu-kvm: /usr/bin/kvm > 2016-02-09 / 18:43:50 ♒♒♒  ☺ > > rrs@learner:/var/tmp/hurd$ cat `which kvm` > #! /bin/s

Re: virtio support

2016-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 19:09:16 +0530, wrote: > rrs@learner:~/.rrs-home/Libvirt-Images$ sudo fdisk -l Hurd.qcow Mmm, is the qcow format really usable with normal tools? AIUI it's a compressed format, not just a sparse. Samuel

Re: virtio support

2016-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Richard Braun, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 14:53:53 +0100, wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:09:16PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > I think I'm just having a bad time. :-( > > The Hurd is quite unstable and many small errors can force a reset and > file system checking. That happens from times to t

Re: virtio support

2016-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 14:29:10 +0100, wrote: > Meanwhile you can always enter the kernel debugger if you have the -dbg > package > installed: C-A-d, and reboot from there. That won't change anything: ext2fs will not write what it had in cache. Samuel

Re: virtio support

2016-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 18:47:36 +0530, wrote: > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 13:55 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Could somebody take the time to add to gnumach an emergency shortcut > > which triggers the shutdown? I'm really surprised nobody thought > > about

Re: virtio support

2016-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 18:34:45 +0530, wrote: > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 13:53 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > From the report, you can see the CPU being almost 100% User > > Consumed. > > > > By ext2fs and dpkg, that's not surprising. I'

the tokyocabinet testsuite takes ages

2016-02-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, The tokyocabinet testsuite currently takes ages to run, it didn't use to do that (e.g. on 28th january with version -5), it's really odd, there were only little source code change, and no gnumach, hurd or libc0.3 change, can somebody have a look? Thanks, Samuel

Re: the tokyocabinet testsuite takes ages

2016-02-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Thu 11 Feb 2016 13:40:29 +0100, wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 23:19 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > The tokyocabinet testsuite currently takes ages to run, it didn't use to > > do that (e.g. on 28th january with version -5), it's really odd, there &g

Re: the tokyocabinet testsuite takes ages

2016-02-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Thu 11 Feb 2016 14:50:17 +0100, wrote: > Svante Signell, on Thu 11 Feb 2016 13:40:29 +0100, wrote: > > I've found the problem: The configure flag: --enable-uyeild was added to > > -6, to  > > enable race-condition detection, see > >

Re: the tokyocabinet testsuite takes ages

2016-02-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Thu 11 Feb 2016 17:30:31 +0100, wrote: > tokyocabinet builds fine with your patch. Did you submit a bug report? Nope, I'm still at work :) Samuel

Bug#814854: hurd: some fixes

2016-02-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: pbuilder Version: 0.223 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hello, I have attached a few more fixes for the hurd case: we should just drop all translator entries from /dev and /servers/socket, just to be on the safe side. Also, mounting /pro

Bug#815497: crosshurd: Hurd deb package fails to install

2016-02-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible Mmm, I have no issue with crosshurd at the moment. Wondering what is different in your setup and in mine. I typically test by pointing crosshurd at non-yet-existing /tmp/crosshurd raphael, on Sun 21 Feb 2016 23:12:53 +0100, wrote: > When trying to install hurd

Bug#815497: crosshurd: Hurd deb package fails to install

2016-02-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
raphael truc, on Mon 22 Feb 2016 00:06:54 +0100, wrote: > In fact the packages are downloaded Are the downloads really complete? > doing a ln -s /var/cache/apt /mnt/var/cache erases any previous errors when > doing a crosshurd after Ok, but still there's something that went wrong, and we should

Bug#815497: crosshurd: Hurd deb package fails to install

2016-02-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
raphael truc, on Mon 22 Feb 2016 00:39:50 +0100, wrote: > The downloads seems complete. > It's not a hiccup, I've encountered the same bugs two or three times these few > weeks Then we need to determine what's getting wrong. How do you run this, precisely? Samuel

Bug#815497: crosshurd: Hurd deb package fails to install

2016-02-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
raphael truc, on Mon 22 Feb 2016 19:50:49 +0100, wrote: > Well, I mount the partition on /mnt and run crosshurd  Well, that works for me :) Are you using a jessie, stretch or sid host? Samuel

Bug#815497: crosshurd: Hurd deb package fails to install

2016-02-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
raphael truc, on Mon 22 Feb 2016 22:13:50 +0100, wrote: > It's a stretch host Ok, same here. I guess it's completely up to date? > Maybe there is a conf file somewhere I missed ! The default values provided in /etc/crosshurd should just work fine, and what is not there is asked interactively by

Re: mahler.debian.net: broken .builddrc resulting in bouncing mails

2016-02-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Ansgar Burchardt, on Mon 29 Feb 2016 13:58:05 +0100, wrote: > mahler.d.n has a broken .builddrc resulting in bounces, see below. Ooops, sorry, that should be fixed now. Thanks, Samuel

Re: HURD porting machine, exodar

2016-03-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Adam Majer, on Sat 05 Mar 2016 17:23:41 -0600, wrote: > exodar.debian.net, the only Hurd porter box listed on > db.d.o/machines.cgi, seems to have a completely out of whack > date. It's currently 2031 on the box. That should be fixed now. > Also, the admin's contact email is not working.

Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support

2016-03-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Svante Signell, on Sun 13 Mar 2016 14:19:35 +0100, wrote: > Running the code reveals that the current implementation in glibc is buggy: > > ./scm_rights+creds_recv > Number of SCM_RIGHTS [<=3], SCM_CREDS [<=2]: [1,1]  > Input error: Using defaults:  > NRIGHTS = 1, NCREDS = 1 > scm_rights+c

Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support

2016-03-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 09:05:56 +0100, wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 00:57 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, on Sun 13 Mar 2016 14:19:35 +0100, wrote: > > > Running the code reveals that the current implementation in glibc is > > > buggy

Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support

2016-03-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 12:20:18 +0100, wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 12:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 09:05:56 +0100, wrote: > > > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 00:57 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Svante Signel

Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support

2016-03-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 14:35:13 +0100, wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 14:23 +0100, Richard Braun wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:16:17PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Svante Signell, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 12:20:18 +0100, wrote: > > > > Why, b

Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support

2016-03-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 14:29:56 +0100, wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 12:20 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 12:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > > And with my old implementation it worked perfectly too. > > > > >

Re: hurd_0.7.git20160316-1_hurd-i386.changes is NEW

2016-03-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Debian FTP Masters, on Wed 16 Mar 2016 01:49:35 +, wrote: > binary:hurd-headers-dev is NEW. > binary:libihash-dev is NEW. Again, these shouldn't have come here as NEW: they are never built by the hurd source package in unstaged builds, they are only built for bootstrap stages. I have

new installation CD and preinstalled images

2016-03-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, At last I took the time to prepare newer installation CD images and a newer preinstalled image, available as usual on http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/hurd-i386 and http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/hurd-i386/installer/cdimage/current/ Samuel

Re: php7.0: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)

2016-03-31 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Svante Signell, on Thu 31 Mar 2016 10:11:35 +0200, wrote: > +len = strlen(ZONEINFO_PREFIX) + 9 + 1; > +zone_tab = malloc(len); > +strncpy(zone_tab, ZONEINFO_PREFIX "/zone.tab", len); > > fp = fopen(zone_tab, "r"); > if (!fp) { > +free(zone_tab); > re

Re: new installation CD and preinstalled images

2016-04-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Adam Richards, on Sun 03 Apr 2016 20:44:56 +0100, wrote: > version, that after the hurd-console loads I get the following error: > > unexpected RESEND from keyboard Uh. So this computer is not behaving as usual. Closer investigation would be needed to determine whether it's our driver whi

Re: new installation CD and preinstalled images

2016-04-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Adam Richards, on Tue 05 Apr 2016 22:03:42 +0100, wrote: > > unexpected RESEND from keyboard > > Uh. So this computer is not behaving as usual. Closer investigation would > be needed to determine whether it's our driver which is buggy, or the > hardware which doesn't respect the st

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

2016-04-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Steven Chamberlain, on Thu 07 Apr 2016 01:47:58 +0100, wrote: > Christoph Egger wrote: > > Start 284: RunCMake.Configure > > 284/371 Test #284: RunCMake.Configure > > ...***Failed3.19 sec > > I have a wild idea what might be happening here. Please could yo

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

2016-04-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Steven Chamberlain, on Thu 07 Apr 2016 11:54:26 +0100, wrote: > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Nothing was attached :) > > Sorry - attached! Mmm, nope :) Samuel

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

2016-04-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Thu 07 Apr 2016 13:07:18 +0200, wrote: > Steven Chamberlain, on Thu 07 Apr 2016 11:54:26 +0100, wrote: > > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Nothing was attached :) > > > > Sorry - attached! > > Mmm, nope :) BTW, you may find set abort

Re: Warning: glibc-2.22-6 is broken on Hurd

2016-04-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Tue 19 Apr 2016 11:46:18 +0200, wrote: > As seen on #hurd: > > starting /hurd/startup fails: > "Unexpected error: Invalid argument" The fixed 2.22-7 just got accepted, it'll land on mirrors within ~6-12h. Samuel

Re: [PATCH] gnumach: debian/rules: Add custom keyword to custom built packages and uname -v

2016-04-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Svante Signell, on Wed 20 Apr 2016 16:36:23 +0200, wrote: > shorten the gnumach-image package names containing the kernel a > little. Why doing this? It prevents from installing various custom kernel versions. Samuel

Re: [PATCH] gnumach: debian/rules: Add custom keyword to custom built packages and uname -v

2016-04-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Wed 20 Apr 2016 23:40:31 +0200, wrote: > With the naming now you cannot make more than one custom version of > the 1.6 release. Yes, that's sort of needed, to avoid having to fix d-i for each and every release. > As it is now you cannot make several versions of > e.g. gnumach-1

Re: Build times of hurd and glibc for different versions of gnumach, hurd and glibc

2016-04-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
BTW, I have also commited rules to build the hurd-prof package. This can however only built with a fixed gcc package ; the patch is pending upload, I have put built binaries on http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/ and then you uncomment the hurd-prof entry in debian/control, and build with dpk

Re: [PATCH] gnumach: debian/rules: Add custom keyword to custom built packages and uname -v

2016-04-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Thu 21 Apr 2016 12:22:25 +0200, wrote: > On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 23:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, on Wed 20 Apr 2016 23:40:31 +0200, wrote: > ... > > > It would be much better to create custom versions of a given kernel, > > &

Re: Bug#822179: xorg: X.Org X Server starts normally, crashes with Segmentation fault on starting any application

2016-04-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, James Clarke, on Sat 23 Apr 2016 14:44:52 +0100, wrote: > I have attached a proposed patch which ensures XFD_SETSIZE never > exceeds FD_SETSIZE. Did you test it? AIUI, nothing uses XFD_SETSIZE actually, it's just the default value that X uses for FD_SETSIZE in case it's not already define

Re: Bug#822179: xorg: X.Org X Server starts normally, crashes with Segmentation fault on starting any application

2016-04-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
James Clarke, on Sat 23 Apr 2016 15:03:29 +0100, wrote: > > AIUI, nothing uses XFD_SETSIZE actually, it's just the default value > > that X uses for FD_SETSIZE in case it's not already defined. > > No, in e.g. os/WaitFor.c in xorg-server, there are for loops using > howmany(XFD_SETSIZE, NFDBITS) t

Re: Bug#822179: xorg: X.Org X Server starts normally, crashes with Segmentation fault on starting any application

2016-04-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
James Clarke, on Sat 23 Apr 2016 15:08:13 +0100, wrote: > > On 23 Apr 2016, at 15:06, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > James Clarke, on Sat 23 Apr 2016 15:03:29 +0100, wrote: > >>> AIUI, nothing uses XFD_SETSIZE actually, it's just the default value > >&

Re: dash is stuck on hurd-i386

2016-04-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Andreas Beckmann, on Sat 30 Apr 2016 16:48:57 +0200, wrote: > could someone gently kick dash on hurd-i386 which is in "Building" state > for a month now ... Well, no: #755446 will probably still be impacting us, until we get to fix it somehow. Samuel

Bug#598427:

2016-05-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Rodrigo Valiña Gutiérrez, on Wed 18 May 2016 17:25:02 +0200, wrote: > +if [ x"$TARGET" = x ]; then > + echo "Refused to overwrite inexistent/empty TARGET." > + exit 1 > +fi I have commited this. The original feature request remains to be implemented, though. Samuel

Bug#825229: crosshurd: Incompatibility with update-grub. Fails to boot.

2016-05-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Thanks for the gnumach.gz link patch. Ideally the upgrade-grub scripts should find gnumach* kernels (just like it does when run natively from a Hurd system), but in the meanwhile the symlink can't hurt. Rodrigo Valiña Gutiérrez, on Tue 24 May 2016 21:48:58 +0200, wrote: > Running crosshurd

Re: procps: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2016-05-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Aapo Rantalainen, on Wed 25 May 2016 23:24:59 +0300, wrote: > ++#ifndef __GNU__ > + #include > ++#endif > ++#ifdef PR_SET_NAME > + prctl(PR_SET_NAME, MY_NAME, NULL, NULL, NULL); > ++#endif Better add prctl into the AC_CHECK_FUNCS list in configure.ac, than hardcoding this. > - (

glibc i686 build

2016-05-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, I have fixed the i686 build of glibc: - 3904414a3008751ffcaf18fbe33bd34812b7bfe5 fixes the _hurd_self_sigstate reference from sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/longjmp_chk.S, which was making the final libc.so link fail with a newer binutils. - ifunc is not working yet with static binaries

Bug#825975: sysvinit: Add missing poweroff on hurd-i386

2016-05-31 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: sysvinit Version: 2.88dsf-59.4 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Tags: hurd Hello, The sysvinit-core package currently doesn't ship a /sbin/poweroff for hurd-i386 with proper alternative configuration. The attached patch fixes that, could you please appl

Re: Bug#826043: apt: gpg validation fails on hurd

2016-06-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Adam Borowski, on Wed 01 Jun 2016 21:50:50 +0200, wrote: > Despite all the relevant keys being installed (debian-archive-keyring, > debian-ports-archive-keyring; "apt-key list" says they're there), I get: > > W: GPG error: http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports unreleased InRelease: > The follow

Re: Bug#826043: apt: gpg validation fails on hurd

2016-06-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Wed 01 Jun 2016 23:40:16 +0200, wrote: > apt-get install --reinstall debian-archive-keyring > > didn't fix it. > > dpkg --force-depends -P debian-archive-keyring > dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/debian-archive-keyring* > > did fix it. Ah, no, i

Re: Bug#826043: apt: gpg validation fails on hurd

2016-06-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Thu 02 Jun 2016 00:08:58 +0200, wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Wed 01 Jun 2016 23:40:16 +0200, wrote: > > apt-get install --reinstall debian-archive-keyring > > > > didn't fix it. > > > > dpkg --force-depends -P debian-archive-keyring >

Re: Bug#826043: apt: gpg validation fails on hurd

2016-06-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Thu 02 Jun 2016 00:15:11 +0200, wrote: > More precisely, running it from a directory which has perms 700 gets the > issue. Ok, I see the issue. What happens is that nowadays apt uses an _apt user to do some operations, and notably running find -L /etc/apt/trusted

Re: Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

2016-06-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
reference files exactly, the only minimal need is knowing which licences end up in the gnumach binary). Samuel Samuel Thibault, on Sun 17 Jan 2016 14:48:44 +0100, wrote: > Could somebody have a look? > > Thanks, > Samuel > > Thorsten Alteholz, on Thu 16 Jul 2015 23:13:52 +0200,

Re: Bug#826175: xargs: Segfaults on hurd

2016-06-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Fri 03 Jun 2016 19:56:00 +0200, wrote: > And the faccessat bug should have been fixed since a long time. Note: I'm working on it. Samuel

Re: Bug#826175: xargs: Segfaults on hurd

2016-06-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Samuel Thibault, on Sat 04 Jun 2016 18:40:26 +0200, wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Sat 04 Jun 2016 17:50:42 +0200, wrote: > > Samuel Thibault, on Fri 03 Jun 2016 20:45:15 +0200, wrote: > > > Anyway, let's just fix this. > > > > It seems to be a bug when ca

Re: openssl on hurd

2016-07-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Kurt Roeckx, on Sat 02 Jul 2016 15:03:32 +0200, wrote: > 1:error:25066067:DSO support routines:dlfcn_load:could not load the shared > library:crypto/dso/dso_dlfcn.c:111:filename(.././engines/ossltest): > .././engines/ossltest: cannot open shared object file: No such file or > directory

Bug#829591: hurd: pseudoterminal hangs when I press ^O (flush)

2016-07-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, on Thu 07 Jul 2016 23:32:19 +0300, wrote: > I patched term/users.c (open_hook) so it clears the FLUSH_OUTPUT > flag if the tty was not already open. There again, such few-lines change is not copyrightable, and thus doesn't need copyright assignment. Samuel

Re: rsyslogd broken because libc0.3 is missing pthread_setcancelstate

2016-07-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Esa Peuha, on Mon 11 Jul 2016 20:06:12 +0300, wrote: > could not load module '/usr/lib/rsyslog/lmnet.so', dlopen: > /usr/lib/rsyslog/lmnet.so: symbol pthread_setcancelstate, version > GLIBC_2.21 not defined in file libc.so.0.3 with link time reference I seems I forgot to add the pthr

Re: Seeking for hurd box

2016-08-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Dmitry Bogatov, on Wed 27 Jul 2016 22:36:28 +0300, wrote: > I am looking for a way to reproduce arch-dependent bugs (#832544, > #832543). There is no DSA porter boxes for none of hurd,m68k,sh4. DSA only manages porter boxes for architectures that have been released or are being released (

Re: [PATCH] [hurd] pflocal/socket.c: Support MSG_DONTWAIT in pflocal send/recv

2016-08-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Christian Seiler, on Fri 05 Aug 2016 21:09:21 +0200, wrote: > I've attached a patch that fixes this specific issue for me. I > probably won't have time to look at the other issue I reported > here, but with that I'd at least be able to have open-isns > working on Hurd. (And the patch will l

Re: openssl 1.1.0 on hurd

2016-08-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, on Mon 01 Aug 2016 21:17:47 +0200, wrote: > There is one test in the testsuite that fails from time to time. Chances > are that the next upload builds. It did build indeed, thanks! > If you want to dig deeper and fix it > once and for all then there is an upstream bug o

Re: rsyslogd broken because libc0.3 is missing pthread_setcancelstate

2016-08-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Esa Peuha, on Tue 02 Aug 2016 20:17:01 +0300, wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Samuel Thibault > wrote: > > Esa Peuha, on Mon 11 Jul 2016 20:06:12 +0300, wrote: > >> could not load module '/usr/lib/rsyslog/lmnet.so', dlopen: > >

Re: Problems when booting Debian-Hurd

2016-08-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Richard Braun, on Sat 20 Aug 2016 13:07:17 +0200, wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 01:19:28AM +, Horacio Castellini wrote: > > WARNING: Image format was not specified for 'debian-hurd-20150320.img' and > > probing guessed raw. > > Automatically detecting the format is dangerous for ra

Re: Problems when booting Debian-Hurd

2016-08-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Horacio Castellini, on Sat 20 Aug 2016 01:19:28 +, wrote: > qemu-system-i386 -m 512 -net nic -net user,hostfwd=tcp::-:22 -drive cache= > writeback,file=debian-hurd-20150320.img & > > main-loop: WARNING: I/O thread spun for 1000 iterations > > How can I solve this problem and why it occurs

Re: rsyslog crashed,,, after upgrading the system

2016-08-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Horacio Castellini, on Sat 20 Aug 2016 13:04:27 +, wrote: > 6968.930819000:main thread: Called LogMsg, msg: could not load module > '/usr > /lib/rsyslog/lmnet.so', dlopen: /usr/lib/rsyslog/lmnet.so: symbol > pthread_setcancelstate, version GLIBC_2.13_DEBIAN_31 not defined in file > libc.so

Re: [PATCH] Introduce gsync-based locks to glibc.

2016-08-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, I have cleaned the patch a bit, commited to a branch in our repo, and uploaded a package to debian, so we can test the libc part for now, and we'll include libpthread parts later. Thanks again for the great work! Samuel

Re: [PATCH] Introduce gsync-based locks to glibc.

2016-08-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Tue 23 Aug 2016 22:34:41 +0200, wrote: > and uploaded a package to debian, That'll be libc0.3 2.23-5, will probably be available about tomorrow. Samuel

HEADSUP: upgrading libc0.3 (Was: Introduce gsync-based locks to glibc.)

2016-08-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Tue 23 Aug 2016 22:42:11 +0200, wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Tue 23 Aug 2016 22:34:41 +0200, wrote: > > and uploaded a package to debian, > > That'll be libc0.3 2.23-5, will probably be available about tomorrow. I forgot to mention: this new libc0.3 will t

Bug#835513: rpctrace passes incomplete filename to _hurd_exec_file_name if it finds COMMAND in PATH

2016-08-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, on Fri 26 Aug 2016 15:30:22 +0300, wrote: > Fixing this is simple: get prefixed_name from the existing > file_name_path_lookup call, and if it isn't NULL, then use it > instead of *argv and free it afterwards. It seems simple enough that it's not copyrightable, could

Bug#835513: [PATCH] rpctrace: Pass prefixed_name to _hurd_exec_file_name.

2016-08-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, on Fri 26 Aug 2016 17:23:28 +0300, wrote: > This fixes the following test case: Thanks! > https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Legally-Significant > says a series of minor changes can become significant. Right. > I list my previously applied patches so

Bug#836529: hurd: won't boot if /etc/hurd/runsystem is runsystem.gnu, because runsystem.hurd does not exist

2016-09-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Control: tags -1 + pending Hello, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, on Sat 03 Sep 2016 22:13:20 +0300, wrote: > /etc/hurd/runsystem.hurd, which does not exist. Actually, there were not even upstream rules to install it... This is now fixed. Samuel

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >