visible after the midnight run for the mirrors.
Upload rights should be the same as for hurd-i386.
Regards
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
uld be done now, and should be visible after the next mirror
push.
Cheers,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
gt; on how I should proceed.
I would say stop doing manual upload and start the build daemons.
> Best solution would probably be, if the wanna-build database rescans what's in
> the archive already. Is this possible?
Yes, I can re-enable the hppa wanna-build database if it is act
ll on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2014.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2014.key
Description: application/pgp-keys
si
E5E9 8231 AA65 1E74 623D B0B8
uid Debian Ports Archive Automatic Signing Key (2014)
It can be found as well on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2014.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 102
o you know what could be wrong?
This morning it seems the Packages list is fine, and that the packages
correctly appear on package.d.o. I guess there was a small glitch in the
previous install run.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aure
well on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2015.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2015.key
Description: applicati
administrated machine to non-DD, and the same way to accept autosigning
on buildds which are not administrated by DSA and not even by a DD. We
even have to consider emulated build daemons.
Aurelien
[1] https://titanpad.com/debian-ports
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2015/DebCampAutobu
On 2015-05-06 10:44, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> [ with my m68k buildd maintainer and (ex-?) porter hat ]
>
> Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>
> >- debian-ports uses mini-dak instead of dak. It uses less resources and
> > brings some features that are useful for new architectures li
well on:
<http://ftp.debian-ports.org/archive/archive_2016.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2016.key
Description: applicati
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/Europe/2016/DSC#Events
[2] http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/
[3] http://deb.debian.org/
[4] http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports-cd/
[5] https://www.ports.debian.org
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@au
On 2016-05-28 13:44, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> > APT archive
> > ---
> > The APT archive is now accessible on ftp.ports.debian.org [2], which
> > maps to 2 machines, one in The Netherlands and one in the USA. Here
> > are
on:
<https://www.ports.debian.org/archive_2018.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2018.key
Description: application/pgp-keys
signatu
lan was even to have none of them)
and that it is served through the deb.debian.org CDN.
Besides that mirroring aspect, I agree moving an architecture from
the official to the debian-ports archive is just moving the load to a
different set of Debian person and different set of Debian hardware.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
an inject that in the debian-ports archive.
It would be nice to have a bit more than 2 weeks to do all of that.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
ease.
Unfortunately the disk space on the ganeti cluster where the porta.d.o
VM is hosted is also getting low.
The CPU and RAM is however probably to low to add the 3 ports, unless we
reduce the number of archive-install run per day (currently running
every 6 hours).
Aurel
On 2019-04-13 13:07, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 4/13/2019 12:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
> > deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and debug) and
> > associate them with the .changes fil
ith only
unreleased.
> They were not uploaded at the time. I don't know if the current
> debian-port upload queue can now take them for the unreleased distrib.
mini-dak is based on .changes file. For that you need to upload the
source and binaries all together.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ly if you are not satisfied by the way it works.
Feel free to get them hosted somewhere else.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2019-04-14 10:23, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 12:59 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2019-04-13 12:37, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Before even thinking about uploading the hurd-i386 and kfreebsd
> > > unsta
t the sources are available. Note that this has been like this since
unreleased exist as mini-dak doesn't support that. This is totally
unrelated to the migration of the archive.
> What would be the correct form of that apt config line?
The correct line for the unstable and experimental sour
On 2019-04-13 17:01, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15371 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > > How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
> > > time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
>
> > The process to inject all pack
Hi,
On 2019-04-24 12:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15381 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > > > It would be nice to have a bit more than 2 weeks to do all of that.
> > > Ok. How much? Is 6 or 8 weeks better? I don't think, given how long this
> > >
On 2019-05-25 13:00, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Em sáb, 25 de mai de 2019 às 10:57, Aurelien Jarno
> escreveu:
> >
> > kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As
> > hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that al
he gcc repository? Would it be possible to stop using
that outdated embedded copy and use the debian libffi package instead?
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
/
Best regards,
Aurelien
[1] http://www.nctu.edu.tw
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
3EFD 1509 AE4A 3129 0917 E535
uid Debian Ports Archive Automatic Signing Key (2009)
It can be found as well on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2009.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024
://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian-snapshot/lenny/
[3] http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian-snapshot/
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
if dpkg -s $i >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> dpkg -s $i | grep -v Depends: >> $APTDIR/state/status
> echo >> $APTDIR/state/status
Except the changelog entry as noticed by Otavio, this looks fine.
--
Aurelien Jarno
with the
> non-ready changes. What others think?
I think so, the kfreebsd branch should be done for development. Once the
code is ready, it should probably be committed to trunk.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://ww
bian-cd/current/ is up to date.
If possible, http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian-cd/hurd-i386/ should be
used instead. The other link dates from the time only Hurd CD where
hosted here, and is actually a symlink on the server side.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCD
eally know about regressions. I have been able to install the
package and reboot my machine without any problem through.
Could someone confirm that it is ok to build eglibc with gcc 4.4 on
hurd, so that I can do the switch in the next upload?
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:42:13PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno, le Thu 26 Nov 2009 11:29:45 +0100, a écrit :
> > I have been able to install the
> > package and reboot my machine without any problem through.
>
> Another needed test is to recompile the
hed to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2010.key
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
_with_hack_to_help_umount.diff] [util-linux.umount.diff]
> Hurd: issue a 'settrans' command
> * swapon/swapoff:
> FreeBSD: [util-linux.swaponoff.diff]
> Hurd: to be investigated
>
> Branches
>
>
> * osports: the main branch, based on u
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2011.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2011.key
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Desc
this week, at
> least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc. GCC 4.6 apparently will be
If you do the switch, please also add mips and mipsel, that would avoid
you to have to complain in two weeks that these architectures have not
yet been switched.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG
ll on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2012.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2012.key
Description: application/pgp-keys
si
ll on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2013.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2013.key
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
.debian.org and is kept
> in
> another place.
>
hppa porters have ignored my emails during a few years, and then started
to write me during a few more years using an email address that went
to /dev/null, so they never got my answers, and thus never answered me...
This is true th
,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
The nice() code glibc seems to have changed a lot in the glibc since
these two bugs have been reported. Could you (or somebody from
debian-hurd), please give a try to see if the problem is still there?
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024
e gcc 4.1 fixes the problem, but the resulting glibc has not
been tested.
I think compilers are critical for the glibc, so we will have to
coordinate the changes.
Aurélien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Elect
I have started to fix
the problems. But I don't have the time nor the envy to work on TLS
support. So please work on that.
Bye,
Aurelien
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-hppa%40lists.debian.org/msg05063.html
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
Thomas Schwinge a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I
>>> haven
Hi all,
I am currently trying to port the glibc 2.5 on Hurd. I am facing the
problem described here:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18216
Could somebody take a decision about this bug and propose a patch?
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024
nch have to be bend over to not require it.
Thanks to Petr Salinger who send me a patch we have chosen this solution
(as m68k is also affected). That's why I tried to build the glibc on
Hurd (it was easier than on m68k), to make sure the patch was enough.
--
.''`. Aurelien
lease, therefore I guess
we don't have to change anything for the Debian package. But a fix would
be appreciated.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [
Barry deFreese a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Thomas Schwinge a écrit :
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> Support for tls for Hurd systems is still not fixed properly. Details
>>> are at <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?17644>. To get a funct
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
We have the same patch in our SVN. But it has been refused upstream. See
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3992
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian develope
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I am currently trying to port the glibc 2.5 on Hurd. I am facing the
> problem described here:
>
I am facing another problem now...
sigsuspend_not_cancel is not defined for Hurd in
sysdeps/mach/hurd/sigsuspend.c. This function is called fro
c-lock.h: Likewise.
> * sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c (getaddrinfo): Use __libc_once_else and a
> new local function instead of using implementational details.
Commited in our SVN. Note that the same change is needed for linuxthreads.
--
.''`. A
available in Debian, so
a proper patch is welcome.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To
SVN
as it seems harmless for other architectures.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
-
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:31:35AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Aurelien Jarno, le Thu 08 Feb 2007 20:52:33 +0100, a écrit :
> > sigsuspend_not_cancel is not defined for Hurd in
> > sysdeps/mach/hurd/sigsuspend.c. This function is called from
> > sysdeps/
http://buildd.debian-ports.org
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
archive_2007.key
onf/gconftool.c
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@
bindtextdomain (GETTEXT_PACKAGE,GCONF_LOCALE_DIR);
textdomain (GETTEXT_PACKAGE);
- g_thread_init (NULL);
+// g_thread_init (NULL);
_gconf_init_i18n ();
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer
Debian, that sounds like a sensible thing to do for
> the meanwhile, unless one of the other glibc maintainers objects.
>
You can make the patch Hurd specific by using the series.hurd-i386
patch. This way you are sure it won't break other architectures.
--
.''`. A
CF22 5AED 7EC0 0792 1824 4322 9C06
uid Debian Ports Archive Automatic Signing Key (2008) <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
It can be found as well on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2008.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
.''`.
ed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:49:21PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> reassign 469058 linux-2.6,gcc-4.3
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:10:53PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> That's definitively a kernel/gcc-4.3 problem, I have reported it
> upstream: http://lkml.org/lkml
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:53:28PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> - hurd crashes in this case. It has to be fixed
FYI, here is the trace I get on the console:
Kernel page fault at address 0x0, eip = 0x103f4f
Kernel Page fault trap, eip 0x103f4f
kernel: Page fault (14), code=0
Stop
hanks Skyrock/Telefun for hosting the machine, Debian
for buying it, and our former DPL, Sam Hocevar, to make this possible.
Kind regards,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `
63 matches
Mail list logo