big than any other down below and it's actually
> a new architecture anyway.
Libreoffice is actually basically working on riscv64. I have tested it
with openSUSE Tumbleweed on BeagleV Beta and Hifive Unmatched (with an
AMD graphics card).
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Ke
On Jul 22 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Just not registering or unregistering *any* extension.
What does that mean? I haven't seen any errors about extensions.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
&quo
On Jul 22 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Yes. _basically_. (Only with -O0 or maybe -Os as upstreams makefile says,
> though)
On openSUSE Factory, libreoffice is built with the usual compiler flags,
wich includes full optimisation and hardening.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
G
itten in python which neither register when
> registering manually nor when being installed as bundled extensions (see
> the discussion in this thread, not going to reiterate)
How can I test that? I have never used libreoffice before, so I don't
know what to look for.
--
Andreas Sch
iguration-data
Description:
}
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
On Jul 22 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 22.07.23 um 14:28 schrieb Andreas Schwab:
>> On Jul 22 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>
>>> Yes. _basically_. (Only with -O0 or maybe -Os as upstreams makefile says,
>>> though)
>> On openSUSE Factory,
Have you tried java 19 or
20?
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
On Jul 22 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Am 22.07.23 um 15:53 schrieb Andreas Schwab:
>> On Jul 22 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>
>>> Does opensuse have some public git/$VCS?
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:RISCV/libreoffi
On Jul 22 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 22.07.23 um 16:09 schrieb Andreas Schwab:
>> On Jul 22 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>
>>> Am 22.07.23 um 15:53 schrieb Andreas Schwab:
>>>> On Jul 22 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>>>
>
ibc/csu/mach-shortcuts.h
> (in csu/ instead of mach/). AIUI, the patch below would be needed to
> fix the objpfx so that the proper rule is generated, isn't it?
The first thing mach/Makefile does is subdir := mach. Why is that not
sufficient?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...
Why does install-headers depend on crt*.o? That appears to be the
regression to fix.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
repository? Would it be possible to stop using
> that outdated embedded copy and use the debian libffi package instead?
The gcc copy of libffi accepts backports.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
&q
12 matches
Mail list logo
