Re: [PATCH 00/41] The x86_64 port

2023-05-10 Thread Sergey Bugaev
Hello, On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:55 AM Samuel Thibault wrote: > With the available .debs you should now be able to enable these. I'm afraid I'm going to need more guidance here. Your little tutorial in readme [0] is helpful (thank you!), but I still have questions. [0]: https://people.debian.or

Re: [PATCH 00/41] The x86_64 port

2023-05-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sergey Bugaev, le mer. 10 mai 2023 13:25:25 +0300, a ecrit: > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:55 AM Samuel Thibault > wrote: > > With the available .debs you should now be able to enable these. > > I'm afraid I'm going to need more guidance here. Your little tutorial > in readme [0] is helpful (thank

Re: [PATCH 00/41] The x86_64 port

2023-05-10 Thread Sergey Bugaev
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 1:43 PM Samuel Thibault wrote: > For now you'll just be faced with library dependencies, so I'd say just > unpack all lib*.deb (+zlib1g*.deb) and you'll be done. I see, thanks. By the way, I'm now getting ../../isofs/lookup.c:224:1: error: conflicting types for ‘diskfs_g

Re: [PATCH 00/41] The x86_64 port

2023-05-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sergey Bugaev, le mer. 10 mai 2023 14:51:55 +0300, a ecrit: > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 1:43 PM Samuel Thibault > wrote: > > For now you'll just be faced with library dependencies, so I'd say just > > unpack all lib*.deb (+zlib1g*.deb) and you'll be done. > > I see, thanks. > > By the way, I'm no

Re: [PATCH 00/41] The x86_64 port

2023-05-10 Thread Sergey Bugaev
An update from me: /hurd/startup starts up (which means that exec is now working -- how cool is that!) and then spawns auth and proc. But then proc task_terminate's itself (= exists with some error, likely), seemingly somewhere early, maybe even during ld.so startup -- before it gets a chance to o

Re: [PATCH 00/41] The x86_64 port

2023-05-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sergey Bugaev, le mer. 10 mai 2023 19:30:20 +0300, a ecrit: > Dynamic linking also adds its share of complexity, You can always create static builds of the various translators, by running e.g. make proc.static in proc/ Samuel

Re: [PATCH 00/41] The x86_64 port

2023-05-10 Thread Sergey Bugaev
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 7:39 PM Samuel Thibault wrote: > Sergey Bugaev, le mer. 10 mai 2023 19:30:20 +0300, a ecrit: > > Dynamic linking also adds its share of complexity, > > You can always create static builds of the various translators, by > running e.g. make proc.static in proc/ Thank you! --

Re: [PATCH 00/41] The x86_64 port

2023-05-10 Thread Sergey Bugaev
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 9:05 PM Sergey Bugaev wrote: > _hurd_startup crashes on accessing 'args' it has just received from > the exec server in the __exec_startup_get_info. The data arrives > out-of-line, and... broken: > > > > argvType is { msgt_inline = 0, msgt_longform = 1, msgt_deallocate = 1

Re: gcc-13: hurd-amd64 support

2023-05-10 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2023-05-06 at 15:27:34 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Package: gcc-13 > Version: 13.1.0-1 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > We're starting the hurd-amd64 port :) > > Here is a patch to add support to the gcc package (here against the > master branch). Ah, just today I wondered

Re: gcc-13: hurd-amd64 support

2023-05-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Guillem Jover, le jeu. 11 mai 2023 02:24:02 +0200, a ecrit: > On Sat, 2023-05-06 at 15:27:34 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Package: gcc-13 > > Version: 13.1.0-1 > > Severity: important > > Tags: patch > > > We're starting the hurd-amd64 port :) > > > > Here is a patch to add support to the gc