Hi,
while revising bind9 udebs, KiBi suggested that non-Linux architectures
might be using isc-dhcpd instead of udhcpd due some problems and it
might be a good idea to revise the decision now that we have a busybox
maintainer?
Cheers,
--
Ondřej Surý
On 23 Oct 2017, at 08:36, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while revising bind9 udebs, KiBi suggested that non-Linux architectures
> might be using isc-dhcpd instead of udhcpd due some problems and it
> might be a good idea to revise the decision now that we have a busybox
> maintainer?
That's no
On 23/10/17 08:36, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while revising bind9 udebs, KiBi suggested that non-Linux architectures
> might be using isc-dhcpd instead of udhcpd due some problems and it
> might be a good idea to revise the decision now that we have a busybox
> maintainer?
I presume you actual
See
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/434/
and
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/434//console
and
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/434//artifact/results/
if there are an
Just to rephrase my original request then...
Personally, I don't really care about the DHCP client used in d-i, but I
do care about complexity in the bind9 packaging.
The --without-openssl support will go away (probably in BIND 9.13) and I
would rather unify the two sets of libraries into one. If
On 23.10.2017 09:36, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> while revising bind9 udebs, KiBi suggested that non-Linux architectures
> might be using isc-dhcpd instead of udhcpd due some problems and it
> might be a good idea to revise the decision now that we have a busybox
> maintainer?
Ubuntu has used dhclient fo
6 matches
Mail list logo