Hi :)
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-01 22:38:16)
> (I didn't know they wanted ACPI so badly)
Well, there is [0], a OS-independent reference implementation from
Intel (we could rip a GPLed version of this from the Linux kernel).
0: https://www.acpica.org/
Also, if it's only to power down the
Justus Winter, le Fri 02 May 2014 09:28:39 +0200, a écrit :
> Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-01 22:38:16)
> > (I didn't know they wanted ACPI so badly)
>
> Well, there is [0], a OS-independent reference implementation from
> Intel (we could rip a GPLed version of this from the Linux kernel).
>
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-02 09:34:38)
> Justus Winter, le Fri 02 May 2014 09:28:39 +0200, a écrit :
> > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-01 22:38:16)
> > > (I didn't know they wanted ACPI so badly)
> >
> > Well, there is [0], a OS-independent reference implementation from
> > Intel (we cou
Hello,
Svante Signell, le Thu 01 May 2014 22:26:12 +0200, a écrit :
> - rules.patch: Add support for hurd-i386 in architecture list
> - 0015_v8.patch: tools/gyp/v8.gyp: add platform-gnu.cc
> - 0016_gnu.patch: src/platform-gnu.cc: new file with platform specific code
It seeems fine, except
> +//
Hello list,
maybe some can help me on this?
To be able to create a debian-install-cd two udeb packages (partman-palo and
palo-installer - both are related to the bootloader of the hppa architecture)
need to be in "unstable", since the debian-installer will not look in
unreleased and unstable a
Helge Deller dixit:
>Can such a package be uploaded to debian master ftp if I go through
>the standard ITP process?
No.
>If not, is there a way to make this happen on debian-ports somehow?
Not in unstable, only in unreleased. We have the same problem
on m68k with e.g. bootloader packages.
Thi
On 05/02/2014 09:10 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Helge Deller dixit:
>> Can such a package be uploaded to debian master ftp if I go through
>> the standard ITP process?
>
> No.
Ok, I assumed that.
>> If not, is there a way to make this happen on debian-ports somehow?
>
> Not in unstable, only
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>On 05/02/2014 10:05 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> This needs to be addressed on d-i side; we need better support
>>> for the dpo 'unreleased' suite there.
>>
>> Sounds not very simple or clean.
>> How did you solved that on m68k then?
Not yet. I’m not a big friend
8 matches
Mail list logo
