The Debian GNU/HURD web page

2012-06-04 Thread Svante Signell
Hi Samuel, Just for the record, can you add the now resolved bug number of ifupdown, #296115/#672212, and refer to the bug #654381, for icon on the web pages: http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/Hurd With the icon patch applied, except for the . in PATH part, this package builds OK if the tests are

Re: Re: Architecture qualification

2012-06-04 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 10:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > I assume this is not a regular mail correspondence, is it? > > > > I generally consider it polite to give people an opportunity to respond > before assuming that you're being ignored, especially if it's part of a > longer thread. Mayb

Re: The Debian GNU/HURD web page

2012-06-04 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:14:37AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Just for the record, can you add the now resolved bug number of > ifupdown, #296115/#672212, and refer to the bug #654381, for icon on the > web pages: http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/Hurd It is a wiki, do you have issues up

Re: The Debian GNU/Hurd web page

2012-06-04 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 12:34 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:14:37AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > Just for the record, can you add the now resolved bug number of > > ifupdown, #296115/#672212, and refer to the bug #654381, for icon on the > > web pages: http://w

Re: Architecture qualification

2012-06-04 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 4. Juni 2012, Svante Signell wrote: > One issue is how to encourage more people trying Hurd out, when it is > not in testing. I honestly don't think that's the main blocker trying out hurd. Lack of SATA, and USB support are the blocker, I think. And probably also missing meaningfu

Re: Re: Architecture qualification

2012-06-04 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:18 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > From the one of the porters side, this would be a _very_ good solution > > indeed! If GNU/Hurd enters som kind of testing status, the number of > > users and contributors w

Re: Architecture qualification

2012-06-04 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 13:23 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Montag, 4. Juni 2012, Svante Signell wrote: > > One issue is how to encourage more people trying Hurd out, when it is > > not in testing. > > I honestly don't think that's the main blocker trying out hurd. Lack of SATA, > and U

Re: Architecture qualification

2012-06-04 Thread Holger Levsen
On Montag, 4. Juni 2012, Svante Signell wrote: > Do you mean gnome3 and KDE4/5 here, or maybe DRM? DRM > No, this time the work is based on the DDE framework, recently > successfully implemented for network drivers. Ask Samuel Thibault for > more details if interested, he is the person in charge

Re: Architecture qualification

2012-06-04 Thread Steven McDonald
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:37:14 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote: > > No, this time the work is based on the DDE framework, recently > > successfully implemented for network drivers. Ask Samuel Thibault > > for more details if interested, he is the person in charge. BTW: > > USB support might also be possib

Bug#676130: zvbi: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional MAXPATHLEN use

2012-06-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: zvbi Version: 0.2.33-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hello, zvbi FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to an unconditional use of MAXPATHLEN. The attached patch fixes it simply by using the symlink length instead. Samuel -- System Information: Debia

Re: iconx and execve problems

2012-06-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Thu 10 May 2012 11:30:52 +0200, a écrit : > the icon package FTBFS due to a missing . in PATH. Other architectures > does not have this problem. According to Samuel the problem is missing > info from glibc to the exec server about $0. > > In May-June 2010 Emilio Pozuelo monfort

Re: The Debian GNU/HURD web page

2012-06-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Mon 04 Jun 2012 11:14:37 +0200, a écrit : > Having . in PATH; requires more internal changes, like discussed at > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2012-05/msg00028.html > Any news on that? Again, probing for news will *not* make them magically appear. When there are n

Re: iconx and execve problems

2012-06-04 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 04:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Thu 10 May 2012 11:30:52 +0200, a écrit : > > the icon package FTBFS due to a missing . in PATH. Other architectures > > does not have this problem. According to Samuel the problem is missing > > info from glibc to the e