Re: termios and glibc versions

2002-06-19 Thread Guillem Jover
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 02:31:27AM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:50:37PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > I don't know what you think that patch is good for. > > > It has no effect on the termios support in the Hurd. > > > > It will let termios in the Hurd be POSIX

Re: termios and glibc versions

2002-06-18 Thread Roland McGrath
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:50:37PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I don't know what you think that patch is good for. > > It has no effect on the termios support in the Hurd. > > It will let termios in the Hurd be POSIX 1003.1 compliant > and also SUS compliant v2 and v3 (i don't have v1). Wh

Re: termios and glibc versions

2002-06-18 Thread Guillem Jover
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:50:37PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > I don't know what you think that patch is good for. > It has no effect on the termios support in the Hurd. It will let termios in the Hurd be POSIX 1003.1 compliant and also SUS compliant v2 and v3 (i don't have v1). Is to be POSIX

Re: termios and glibc versions

2002-06-17 Thread Roland McGrath
I don't know what you think that patch is good for. It has no effect on the termios support in the Hurd. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: termios and glibc versions

2002-06-17 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 01:51:46AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > While porting util-linux i've found that in the Hurd there is no define > for TABDLY and TAB3 when including . I've looked the SUSv2 and > SUSv3 drafts and it mentions this two defines. Also XTABS is defined, but not > mentioned in t

Re: termios and glibc versions

2002-06-16 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 10:26:15PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > While porting util-linux i've found that in the Hurd there is no define > > for TABDLY and TAB3 when including . I've looked the SUSv2 and > > SUSv3 drafts and it mentions this

Re: termios and glibc versions

2002-06-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While porting util-linux i've found that in the Hurd there is no define > for TABDLY and TAB3 when including . I've looked the SUSv2 and > SUSv3 drafts and it mentions this two defines. Also XTABS is defined, but not > mentioned in the drafts. XTABS ca

termios and glibc versions

2002-06-15 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, While porting util-linux i've found that in the Hurd there is no define for TABDLY and TAB3 when including . I've looked the SUSv2 and SUSv3 drafts and it mentions this two defines. Also XTABS is defined, but not mentioned in the drafts. There is some conditional code dependant on __GNU_LIBR