Juanjo Marín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> root (hd0,5)
> kernel /boot/gnumach.gz -s root=hd0s6
> module /hurd/ext2fs.static --multiboot-command-line=${kernel-command-line}
> module /lib/ld.so.1 /hurd/exec $(exec-task=task-create)
To use this method, your root= must look like this:
root=device:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 05:35:56PM +0100, Ondrej Hurt wrote:
> You are suggesting to make Yet Another Personal Hurd Site but this is
> exactly what I was arguing against. My point was that people should
> contribute to some central site more than to their own sites.
> I can't contribute myself now
exactly what I was arguing against. My point was that people should
contribute to some central site more than to their own sites.
I can't contribute myself now because I am a newcomer. I could only
The web-hurd list is a good place to discuss this.
Early in the summer, Jim Franklin was active on
I copied the line from a printed pdf version and it seems that the pdf cuts
this line.
Sorry for this stupid mistake !!!
I take the document from my Debian CDs H1, CD #1 from the /hurd-doc
directory, so we should correct it (well, if it is wrong, cause maybe my
acrobat reader 4.0 it is bugged
> kernel /boot/gnumach.gz -s root=device:hd0s6
> module /hurd/ext2fs.static --multiboot-command-line=${kernel-command-line}
> module /lib/ld.so.1 /hurd/exec $(exec-task=task-create)
>
> I've got stuck in
Well, you need to actually use the entire command line in -- not just
the first 70 characters.
* Juanjo Marín writes:
> /hurd/ext2fs.static --multiboot-command-line=${kernel-command-line}
That should be:
module /hurd/ext2fs.static --multiboot-command-line=${kernel-command-line}
--host-priv-port=${host-port} --device-master-port=${device-port}
--exec-server-task=${exec-task} -T typed ${roo
Juanjo Marín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I suppose I am using and old bootstrapping, though I am using
> Debian Hurd H1 CDs, with 3.0.15.hurd-H , because if I boot for the
> first time with
[...]
> I've got stuck in
[...]
Yes, that's possible, that these CDs don't support the new method yet.
A las 21:50:48 03/12/01, Moritz Schulte dijo algo como esto:
Neals guide is more uptodate, so the commands found in that guide
should be used. Recently the bootstrapping changed a bit. Previously we used
'serverboot', which took care of starting the server for the root
filesystem and the exec serv
> You are suggesting to make Yet Another Personal Hurd Site but this is
> exactly what I was arguing against.
This is not what he is suggesting.
> My point was that people should
> contribute to some central site more than to their own sites.
> I can't contribute myself now because I am a newcome
A las 21:50:48 03/12/01, Moritz Schulte dijo algo como esto:
Neals guide is more uptodate, so the commands found in that guide
should be used. Recently the bootstrapping changed a bit. Previously we used
'serverboot', which took care of starting the server for the root
filesystem and the exec serv
> > Look above for an idea of what I roughly mean by directory of Hurd
> > specific stuff. I would merge it with hurd.gnu.org.
>
> I like to compare the web site hurrd.gnu.org with the Hurd source code.
> The Hurd source code is the essence of the Hurd development. It is what
> is considered to be
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 11:42:43AM +0100, Ondrej Hurt wrote:
> Look above for an idea of what I roughly mean by directory of Hurd
> specific stuff. I would merge it with hurd.gnu.org.
I like to compare the web site hurrd.gnu.org with the Hurd source code.
The Hurd source code is the essence of the
> > This points to a more general problem: I think that we should make
> > one "official" Hurd web site with all important information.
>
> There is, http://hurd.gnu.org/.
I consider this page a nice starting stage of the central resource
keeper/directory at most.
> > Now all the information is
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> hurd.gnu.org would be the best choice, IMO, but Debian ports page is
> also a good choice (though I think only debian-specific stuff should
> be put in there)
>
THUG (Troronto Hurd Users Group)
http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/thug/docs.html are m
On Mon, 03 Dec 2001 22:50:51 +0100 (CET)
Ondrej Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nice if _most_ of the information spread across web
> was at ONE CENRAL PLACE known to everyone ? Shouldn't we make _one_
> "official" instalation guide which is up-to-date rather than to have
> severa
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:20:19PM +0100, Ondrej Hurt wrote:
> > What needs most work currently is the hurd info manual, where most
> > of the content should be anyway.
>
> What do you mean ? Is it somewhere on-line ?
"info hurd", or at the Hurd web site under Documentation.
> Sure, writing docu
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 06:19:24PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Now, the reality of the situation is that GNU tries its best to
> collect Hurd-specific stuff on hurd.gnu.org while Debian tries to
> collect Debian GNU/Hurd stuff (such as the installation guide)
> on the aforementioned Debian site.
> > Wouldn't it be nice if _most_ of the information spread across web
> > was at ONE CENRAL PLACE known to everyone ?
> Sure, but I think that energy should not only put into collecting
> the bits and pieces, but also to work it over and fill in the gaps.
>
> What needs most work currently is th
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:50:51PM +0100, Ondrej Hurt wrote:
> This points to a more general problem: I think that we should make
> one "official" Hurd web site with all important information.
There is, http://hurd.gnu.org/. From this page, under "Installation"
it mentions that it is possible to
--- Florian Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is wrong with hurd.gnu.org?
If you have something to add there join [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
James Morrison
University of Waterloo
Computer Science - Digital Hardware
2A co-op
http://hurd.dyndns.org
Anyone refering this as 'Open Sour
> Wouldn't it be nice if _most_ of the information spread across web
> was at ONE CENRAL PLACE known to everyone ? Shouldn't we make _one_
> "official" instalation guide which is up-to-date rather than to have
> several personal (sometimes unmaintained) texts ? If anybody has
> something to say he
We already have an official web site for the Hurd [1], and for Debian/Hurd [2].
And the name for the Hurd is `the Hurd', not Hurd.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd
[2] http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd
--
Alfred M. Szmidt
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:50:51PM +0100, Ondrej Hurt wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nice if _most_ of the information spread across web
> was at ONE CENRAL PLACE known to everyone ?
Sure, but I think that energy should not only put into collecting
the bits and pieces, but also to work it over and fill
Neals guide is more uptodate, so the commands found in that guide
should be used.
Recently the bootstrapping changed a bit. Previously we used
'serverboot', which took care of starting the server for the root
filesystem and the exec server. Therefore only serverboot was given
as a multiboot modu
> > but on Matthew Vernon's 'The easy guide to installing Hurd on a Linux
> > box' these commands aren't mentioned
> Neal's guide is much more update, follow it's instructions.
>
> Ryan
This points to a more general problem: I think that we should make
one "official" Hurd web site with all import
Juanjo Marín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but on Matthew Vernon's 'The easy guide to installing Hurd on a Linux
> box' these commands aren't mentioned
Neal's guide is much more update, follow it's instructions.
Ryan
--
Ryan Golbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Computer Science
University Of Waterloo
Hi there,
I'm new on Hurd, in the process of installing on my box :-))), and I have
the following question:
On Neal H Walfield's 'The Hurd Installation Guide' it is said to boot hurd
with
grub> module /hurd/ext2fs.static
--multiboot-command-line=${kernel-command-line}
--host-priv-port=${host
27 matches
Mail list logo
