Re: perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-31 Thread Duck
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This kind of attitude isn't helpful. Can you provide more information > about the problem instead of trying to start a flamewar? Maybe your > system is broken, have you experienced the behaviour you noted on > other systems? There is no flamewar,

Re: perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-30 Thread Andre Caldas
This kind of attitude isn't helpful. Yes, asking for help by giving information when it's asked should be punished. Reporting bugs and problems too. What is this? Provided or not by porters is not the point. If it is not provided by porters, then porters should work on the issue and provide a fixed

Re: perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-30 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> This kind of attitude isn't helpful. Yes, asking for help by giving information when it's asked should be punished. Reporting bugs and problems too. I suggest that you reread the message posted by Marc, it was a stupid attempt at flaming. And that kind of attitude is not helpful. --

Re: perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-30 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Scribit Alfred M. Szmidt dies 29/03/2005 hora 00:27: > This kind of attitude isn't helpful. Yes, asking for help by giving information when it's asked should be punished. Reporting bugs and problems too. > Maybe your system is broken, have you experienced the behaviour you > noted on other system

Re: perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-28 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
This kind of attitude isn't helpful. Can you provide more information about the problem instead of trying to start a flamewar? Maybe your system is broken, have you experienced the behaviour you noted on other systems? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-28 Thread Duck
Marc DequÃnes (Duck) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Eh? If it is not provided by the porters, then either the official >> Debian binary-all package is broken or your system is. I don't see why >> you blame us for that, unless you have information abou

Re: perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-28 Thread Duck
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eh? If it is not provided by the porters, then either the official > Debian binary-all package is broken or your system is. I don't see why > you blame us for that, unless you have information about this than you > provided so far. This was a REPORT !!

Re: perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-28 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:07:31PM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote: > Provided or not by porters is not the point. If it is not provided by > porters, then porters should work on the issue and provide a fixed > package. Eh? If it is not provided by the porters, then either the official Debian binary-al

Re: perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-28 Thread Duck
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > perl-modules is a binary-all package not provided by the Debian GNU/Hurd > porters, so I suggest re-installing it and see whether this solves your > problem. Provided or not by porters is not the point. If it is not provided by porters, then porters sho

Re: perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-27 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 02:15:08AM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote: > When building a pkg, some .pm where missing, but they should be provided > by perl-modules, and dpkg -L confirmed. So i really don't know why these > files where missing and have no time to look at this problem now. I'm > reporting th

perl-modules lack some .pm on Hurd

2005-03-27 Thread Duck
Coin, My HurdBox is up-to-date, and no general perl problem to report. When building a pkg, some .pm where missing, but they should be provided by perl-modules, and dpkg -L confirmed. So i really don't know why these files where missing and have no time to look at this problem now. I'm reporting