Re: glibc status on hurd

2008-03-10 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:40:59AM +, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, le Mon 10 Mar 2008 20:09:10 -0400, a écrit : > > I see. Would it be possible to schedule another glibc build? I am looking at > > the build logs of texmacs package [3] and currently it does not build on > > hu

Re: glibc status on hurd

2008-03-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, le Mon 10 Mar 2008 20:09:10 -0400, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, le Mon 10 Mar 2008 16:52:02 -0400, a écrit : > >> For a long time, I am seeing that the latest glibc 2.7-9 is not being > >> built on hurd-i386 [1]. > > > > Yes, it's just tha

Re: glibc status on hurd

2008-03-10 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Samuel Thibault wrote: > Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, le Mon 10 Mar 2008 16:52:02 -0400, a écrit : >> For a long time, I am seeing that the latest glibc 2.7-9 is not being >> built on hurd-i386 [1]. > > Yes, it's just that it takes a long time to compile, which is better > spent on other packages, so w

Re: glibc status on hurd

2008-03-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, le Mon 10 Mar 2008 16:52:02 -0400, a écrit : > For a long time, I am seeing that the latest glibc 2.7-9 is not being built > on hurd-i386 [1]. Yes, it's just that it takes a long time to compile, which is better spent on other packages, so we don't build all glibc versions,

glibc status on hurd

2008-03-10 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
For a long time, I am seeing that the latest glibc 2.7-9 is not being built on hurd-i386 [1]. Clicking on the hurd-i386 link is not helpful either [2]. It just shows that there are 2045 in Dep-Wait, 1687 Needs-Build. Where to even start to track down the problem? What is the status of glibc on hurd