On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Mikko Moilanen wrote:
>
>The K3 images included XFree86 4.3, the official XFree86 is 4.2, which do
>people want on the K4 images?
>
> That one which will work?
4.3 is what has been asked for. It was on the K3 images.
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:12:27PM +0300, Mikko Moilanen wrote:
>
>The K3 images included XFree86 4.3, the official XFree86 is 4.2, which do
>people want on the K4 images?
>
> That one which will work?
Both work, but note the choice is between Xfree86 4.1 and Xfree86 4
The K3 images included XFree86 4.3, the official XFree86 is 4.2, which do
people want on the K4 images?
That one which will work?
--
http://kotisivu.dnainternet.net/moilami1
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 04:48:40AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> The verdict is 4.3 I spoke to Branden yesterday, sorry about the delay.
> There should be a new upload into experimental. It would ideal if the
> packages were based on that, but I'm guess we can get away with the ones
> in Robert's d
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 03:03:22PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> (To someone else:) What's the problem with compiling gcc-defaults bound
> to gcc-3.3?
Probably that the buildd's down AFAIK, and nobody built the package yet.
I might some day when I find time and a box to build the latest gcc.
Mi
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > The verdict is 4.3 I spoke to Branden yesterday, sorry about the delay.
> > There should be a new upload into experimental. It would ideal if the
> > packages were based on that, but I'm guess we can get away with the ones
> > in R
Jeff Bailey wrote:
The verdict is 4.3 I spoke to Branden yesterday, sorry about the delay.
There should be a new upload into experimental. It would ideal if the
packages were based on that, but I'm guess we can get away with the ones
in Robert's directory in the meantime.
Does parted work? (Patc
The verdict is 4.3 I spoke to Branden yesterday, sorry about the delay.
There should be a new upload into experimental. It would ideal if the
packages were based on that, but I'm guess we can get away with the ones
in Robert's directory in the meantime.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at
The K3 images included XFree86 4.3, the official XFree86 is 4.2, which do
people want on the K4 images?
Comments please.
The preliminary stages for K4 are going well.
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
+64 3 488 2818Fax +64 3 488 2875
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Cross compiling X is insane.
Why exactly is it insane?
moritz
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://duesseldorf.ccc.de/~moritz/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 04:52:53PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> I failed to compile X 4.2/4.1 multiple times too. I have a slow PC and
> compilation requires 2-3 hours (PIII-800). Nevertheless hurd seems to be to
> unstable, it crashs very often and I have to start from beginning.
I don't know wh
I failed to compile X 4.2/4.1 multiple times too. I have a slow PC and
compilation requires 2-3 hours (PIII-800). Nevertheless hurd seems to be to
unstable, it crashs very often and I have to start from beginning. (I moved
parts of the tree to another partition and linked everything to the new d
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe Daniel wants to summarize what we discussed at the party about what
> needs to be done to get a foot into this issue.
Sir, yes, sir!
Ok, let's start thing some basic things. First of all you don't need
to write a complete new ext2 translator
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:04:35AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:36:53PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > ... How did you build X the last time?
> I used two partitions which I mounted at strategic points.
Aha, thanks - I think see what you mean by "strategic".
> >
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:36:53PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> ... How did you build X the last time?
I used two partitions which I mounted at strategic points.
> Btw, this ext2fs issue is really starting to bug the hell out of me.
> Sorry for the foul language, but if someone isn't working o
Hi everyone,
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:37:07AM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:06:44PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I need X 4.2 as a build-dependency for porting; we have 4.1 in alpha atm.
> > before going for 4.2 i have a pair of questions:
> > - has anyone tried a
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:06:44PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> I need X 4.2 as a build-dependency for porting; we have 4.1 in alpha atm.
> before going for 4.2 i have a pair of questions:
> - has anyone tried at 4.2? any build problem?
I almost finished building Xfree 4.2 yesterday. Sadly
I ran
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Yeah. Which makes me remember what it was. There was a problem with a
> program wanting to use a C++ libraries in a C program or such. I didn't
> knew if that was a gcc issue (we used 3.x earlier than other Debian ports),
> or
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:55:59PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:06:44PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > - anyone knows what kind of hack does the 4.1 in alpha have?
> >
> > I don't remember, but it
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:06:44PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > - anyone knows what kind of hack does the 4.1 in alpha have?
>
> I don't remember, but it can't have been anything serious. Just a small
> glitch in the packaging
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:06:44PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> - anyone knows what kind of hack does the 4.1 in alpha have?
I don't remember, but it can't have been anything serious. Just a small
glitch in the packaging or so.
Building X is a pain in the ass, but it doesn't require any magic h
Hello,
I need X 4.2 as a build-dependency for porting; we have 4.1 in alpha atm.
before going for 4.2 i have a pair of questions:
- has anyone tried at 4.2? any build problem?
- anyone knows what kind of hack does the 4.1 in alpha have?
thanks
--
Robert Millan
"Omnis enim res, quad dando no
22 matches
Mail list logo
