Re: Toolchain TLS support

2006-09-05 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> glibc hasn't worked out of the box for atleast a year since > malloc/memusage.c uses __thread without #if's. Ok so glibc 2.4 as such doesn't work (that was the original question). glibc since 2.3 hasn't worked out of the box, either CVS or otherwise. Nor will the malloc/memusage.c t

Re: Toolchain TLS support

2006-09-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Alfred M. Szmidt, le Tue 05 Sep 2006 12:44:12 +0200, a écrit : >> As I said, these patches will become avaiable with time. But as >> such, both GCC and GLIBC work fine on GNU; you are of course free >> to inisist on otherwise if that makes you happy. > >By "as such", do you mean "

Re: Toolchain TLS support

2006-09-05 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> As I said, these patches will become avaiable with time. But as > such, both GCC and GLIBC work fine on GNU; you are of course free > to inisist on otherwise if that makes you happy. By "as such", do you mean "upstream glibc 2.4 release and gcc 4.1", or your patched versions? Th

Re: Toolchain TLS support

2006-09-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Alfred M. Szmidt, le Tue 05 Sep 2006 11:57:08 +0200, a écrit : > As I said, these patches will become avaiable with time. But as such, > both GCC and GLIBC work fine on GNU; you are of course free to inisist > on otherwise if that makes you happy. By "as such", do you mean "upstream glibc 2.4 rel

Re: Toolchain TLS support

2006-09-05 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
As I said, these patches will become avaiable with time. But as such, both GCC and GLIBC work fine on GNU; you are of course free to inisist on otherwise if that makes you happy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Toolchain TLS support

2006-09-05 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:05:12AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >glibc 2.4 is completely unusable for GNU/Hurd at the moment, > > Not true. It might be true for Debian GNU/Hurd though. Wrong. It's also true for the glibc as it is in upstream's cvs repository. Period. If you have patches

Re: Toolchain TLS support

2006-09-05 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
glibc 2.4 is completely unusable for GNU/Hurd at the moment, Not true. It might be true for Debian GNU/Hurd though. Also, a GCC 4.1-build glibc doesn't work correctly: it already fails during the building process, as soon as the newly created libc.so is being used (might also be ld.s

Re: Toolchain TLS support

2006-09-05 Thread Thomas Schwinge
[Cced to bug-hurd and hurd-devel.] Hello! For one part, this is essentally a repetition of ; everything in there still applies. For the other part, new issues are to be worked on, see below. On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:49:45AM

Toolchain TLS support

2006-08-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi m68k and hurd porters, Thread Local Storage (TLS) support has been added to the toolchain (binutils, gcc, glibc) some times ago. Currently about half of the architectures have full TLS support (ie binutils + gcc + glibc). If we count the glibc in experimental all the architectures but the