EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.scyld.com/network/rtl8139.html
sis900.c: modified v1.06.11 4/30/2002
eth0: SiS 900 PCI Fast Ethernet at 0xd400, IRQ 11, 0: b:6a:5f:39:ec.
eth0: Realtek RTL8201 PHY transceiver found at address 1.
eth0: Using transceiver found at address 1 as default
via-rhine.c:v1.16
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:34:07AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:24:15PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:05:04AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > > If someone is interrested and likes to further work on it, I can help
> > > > as far as my time
Hi,
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:24:15PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:05:04AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > If someone is interrested and likes to further work on it, I can help
> > > as far as my time and skills allow. For now I) have no ideas left.
> >
> > I'll add
Hi Manuel, Thomas and all others,
some comments concerning the SiS900 patch:
As mentioned, I used a patch originally prepared by Manuel Menal and
Gaël Le Mignot. The changes I made are rather small and can be seen by
"diff-ing" the original patch with the newer version (sis900.c). I d
However, later it must still be obvious to figure out easily if a
committed change is an update from Linux-2.0.x, a backport from
e.g. Linux-2.2.x, or a Mach-specific change. The ChangeLog is not
always explicit there, at least IMHO.
Then I think we should take care to make them clea
[ CCed to bug-hurd. Please reply where it is appropriate. ]
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 04:08:05PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>You should put Linux's original files (i.e. the versions your patch
>is based on) into linux/src/ and put your modified files into
>linux/dev/. The files fro
Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
Hi all,
Hey,
[snip]
In addition I removed some "printk"- debugging.
Are you quite sure they weren't needed ? I know it might sound strange,
but when we first made the patch (I believe you based this on the
original patch posted by Gaël and I ?), we experienced a problem that
You should put Linux's original files (i.e. the versions your patch
is based on) into linux/src/ and put your modified files into
linux/dev/. The files from linux/dev/ will shadow the linux/src/
ones.
I disagree very strongly (and thus disagree with the comment in one of
the Makefiles
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:47:09PM +0200, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> [ SiS900 driver ]
> exploring the code where the patch went wrong led to minor changes in
> the eeprom (mac address-) reading function ...
>
> In addition I removed some "printk"- debugging.
..., so y
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:05:04AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > If someone is interrested and likes to further work on it, I can help
> > as far as my time and skills allow. For now I) have no ideas left.
>
> I'll add this patch to the debian package this weekend.
Is this still planned? Seems
ackage has support for sis900?
Thanks.
God bless
Hiran
On 4/29/05, Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to have the sis900-enabled kernel, too ;-)
Andreas B. Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on the 28th of March sent a
patch
for SiS-900.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Yea, but the problem with having a patch is that some of us aren't
quite sure how to apply the patch.
Knowning how to apply patches is a good skill to learn.
but is there any plan to apply the patch permanently so that the
stock kernel used in the base package has support for s
Yea, but the problem with having a patch is that some of us aren't
quite sure how to apply the patch. I suppose it's not too hard to
figure out, but is there any plan to apply the patch permanently so
that the stock kernel used in the base package has support for sis900?
Thanks.
God b
I would like to have the sis900-enabled kernel, too ;-)
Andreas B. Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on the 28th of March sent a patch
for SiS-900.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am 29.04.2005 um 22:03 schrieb Pointer:
Hi,
First sorry my english is really bad
I read all threads about sis900, i found the patch but
im to stupid to build this kernel :(
so my question, has anybody an working kernel, and
can send it via email?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
First sorry my english is really bad
I read all threads about sis900, i found the patch but
im to stupid to build this kernel :(
so my question, has anybody an working kernel, and
can send it via email?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:34:38PM +0100, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> I modified the SiS900-patch given by "Gaël Le Mignot" (Thanks!!!)
> in http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2004/05/msg00079.html.
>
> It can be applied on top of the debian patched mach sou
17 matches
Mail list logo
