On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:40 PM, peter green wrote:
>>
>> :-) I'm one who asked there some time back why java7 is no longer in
>> the archives (unstable/experimental), while the last binaries I had
>> installed still work OK on my mini-pc...
>>
>> I'm just curious, sorry for asking to the lists..
:-) I'm one who asked there some time back why java7 is no longer in
the archives (unstable/experimental), while the last binaries I had
installed still work OK on my mini-pc...
I'm just curious, sorry for asking to the lists... I want to
understand if the mini-pc is still a low performance de
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on
> architectures with non-working java7.
Just asking as a loongson-2f user, :-)
What makes java7 not to work on those architectures? Building issues?
> ...
> So the
Hey Matthias
On 06/05/13 15:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on
architectures with non-working java7.
+1
Patches for the transition to Java7 should be available in the BTS, mostly
submitted by James Page. Some may be still lur
Matthias Klose dixit:
>Currently java bindings/packages are built for all architectures, however some
>architectures still use gcj as the (only available) Java implementation, and
>some OpenJDK zero ports are non-functional at this point, and Debian porters
>usually don't care about that. So the
Matthias Klose, le Mon 06 May 2013 16:22:30 +0200, a écrit :
> - hurd never had openjdk support, and afaik, nobody is working on that.
There has been work towards this, notably by Jeremie Koenig. I don't
know the status, we just have not made it a strong priority so far.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRI
6 matches
Mail list logo
