> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 16:15 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> AC_DEFINE([HAVE_GNU_GETCWD], [1],
> [Define to 1 if you have support for 'getcwd(NULL, 0)' GNU
> extension])
BTW, why calling it a GNU extension, not GLIBC or LIBC.
>From the man page: As an extension to the POSIX
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 16:15 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 14:15:47 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:51 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> >
> > > If you assume getcwd is available, this check is pointless; if you
> > > don't, then you need to skip the check
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 14:15:47 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:51 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
>
> > If you assume getcwd is available, this check is pointless; if you
> > don't, then you need to skip the check below is getcwd has not been
> > found.
>
> New version: (has to
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:51 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> If you assume getcwd is available, this check is pointless; if you
> don't, then you need to skip the check below is getcwd has not been
> found.
New version: (has to be indented?)
AC_CHECK_FUNC([getcwd], AC_DEFINE([HAVE_GETCWD],[1],[Defin
Hi,
Alle mercoledì 17 ottobre 2012, Svante Signell ha scritto:
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS([getcwd])
If you assume getcwd is available, this check is pointless; if you
don't, then you need to skip the check below is getcwd has not been
found.
> AC_MSG_RESULT([checking for getcwd(NULL, 0)... yes])
Usuall
Svante Signell, le Wed 17 Oct 2012 11:26:58 +0200, a écrit :
> AC_MSG_RESULT([checking for getcwd(NULL, 0)... yes])
> AC_DEFINE([HAVE_GETCWD_GLIBC], 1, [Define to 1 if you have support for
> `getcwd(NULL,0)`])
> ],[
> AC_MSG_RESULT([checking for getcwd(NULL, 0)... no])
> ],[
> AC_MSG_CHECKI
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 17 Oct 2012 11:00:38 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 09:27 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > For symmetry reasons the text below
> > > AC_MSG_WARN([getcwd(NULL,0)... cannot run test program while cross
>
Svante Signell, le Wed 17 Oct 2012 11:00:38 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 09:27 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> For symmetry reasons the text below
> > AC_MSG_WARN([getcwd(NULL,0)... cannot run test program while cross
> > compiling])
> should be changed to
> AC_MSG_WARN([checking for
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 09:27 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
For symmetry reasons the text below
> AC_MSG_WARN([getcwd(NULL,0)... cannot run test program while cross
> compiling])
should be changed to
AC_MSG_WARN([checking for getcwd(NULL,0)... cannot run test program
while cross compiling])
> If
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 21:30 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 16 Oct 2012 13:29:58 +0200, a écrit :
> No need to define HAVE_GETCWD_GLIBC to 0, people usually only define it
> to 1 when the feature is available, thus allowing to just use #ifdef
> HAVE_GETCWD_GLIBC.
>
> > ])
>
Svante Signell, le Tue 16 Oct 2012 13:29:58 +0200, a écrit :
> AC_RUN_IFELSE([
> AC_LANG_PROGRAM([
> #ifdef HAVE_GETCWD
> #include
> #endif
> ],[
> char *result = getcwd(NULL,0);
> if (result == NULL)
> return 1;
> ])]
> ,[
> AC_MSG_RESULT([checking for getcwd(NULL, 0)... yes])
> AC_DEFINE([
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 00:00 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Thu 11 Oct 2012 17:46:33 +0200, a écrit :
> > The functions realpath and getcwd are already checked for in
> > configure.ac/configure
>
> But not whether they support being passed NULL, which is what Guillem
> was refe
Svante Signell, le Thu 11 Oct 2012 17:46:33 +0200, a écrit :
> The functions realpath and getcwd are already checked for in
> configure.ac/configure
But not whether they support being passed NULL, which is what Guillem
was referring to in "And getcwd(NULL, 0) has also been supported on
FreeBSD an
13 matches
Mail list logo
