Hi,
Thanks for the responses.
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:28:40 +0100
Pino Toscano wrote:
> I did a bit of debug, and it seems sudo needs a fix, but a different
> one.
> Basically, when parsing the specified sudoers file (or the default one),
> the "sudoerslist" list is populated with the file bei
Pino Toscano, le Sat 14 Jan 2012 20:28:40 +0100, a écrit :
> > Is this something that should be fixed in Hurd (or perhaps eglibc),
>
> I think we could also fix unlink() on the Hurd bits of glibc to give
> EINVAL on NULL parameter, or that would be considered (too) broken code
> anyway?
As Thom
Hi,
Alle sabato 14 gennaio 2012, Steven McDonald ha scritto:
> I've been looking at the problems with visudo as tracked on
> alioth[1]. I've applied Justus's fix to use flock instead of lockf,
> and created a patch that solves the segfault issue (see attached).
> visudo now seems to work correctly
C != Java
Which is to say, a null pointer is not a valid argument to unlink, and the
Hurd's use of a signal instead of an error is allowed by Posix.
Thomas
On Jan 14, 2012 8:48 AM, "Steven McDonald"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking at the problems with visudo as tracked on alioth[1].
> I've a
Hi,
I've been looking at the problems with visudo as tracked on alioth[1].
I've applied Justus's fix to use flock instead of lockf, and created a
patch that solves the segfault issue (see attached). visudo now seems
to work correctly on Hurd.
However, I'm uncertain whether the segfault should act
5 matches
Mail list logo
