Re: Package installability and testing

2008-03-19 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 01:49:59PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > And then somebody has to constantly monitor the packages and > transition them to testing, a process which happens only > semi-automatically. Shadowing Debian's official testing might make > things easier, Do you really think s

Re: Package installability and testing (was: Re: GSoC application deadline passed)

2008-03-18 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 05:31:29PM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Scribit Michael Banck dies 18/03/2008 hora 13:49: > > Shadowing Debian's official testing might make things easier, and > > collaborating with other unofficial architectures (m68k, kfreebsd-*, > > etc.) would probably as well, but it

Re: Package installability and testing (was: Re: GSoC application deadline passed)

2008-03-18 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Scribit Michael Banck dies 18/03/2008 hora 13:49: > Shadowing Debian's official testing might make things easier, and > collaborating with other unofficial architectures (m68k, kfreebsd-*, > etc.) would probably as well, but it will still be a time-consuming > task. BTW, how do other non-official

Package installability and testing (was: Re: GSoC application deadline passed)

2008-03-18 Thread Michael Banck
(CCing debian-hurd as this is really Debian-specific now) On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 01:15:27PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michal Suchanek, le Mon 17 Mar 2008 16:34:42 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > On 17/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL