Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-30 Thread Pino Toscano
On 2014-01-30 18:49, Samuel Thibault wrote: Svante Signell, le Tue 28 Jan 2014 21:33:50 +0100, a écrit : However, version 1.0.17-2 seems to have failed on the buildd. That build attempt was made 210 day ago, maybe a reschedule would be useful :) It still fails to build, and that can be reprodu

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Tue 28 Jan 2014 21:33:50 +0100, a écrit : > However, version 1.0.17-2 seems to have failed on the buildd. > That build attempt was made 210 day ago, maybe a reschedule would be > useful :) It still fails to build, and that can be reproduced on box exodar and darnassus: it hangs

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-29 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 11:32 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 00:36 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > music123 > > build-depends on gnat-4.6-> #732681 gnat-4.8** -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-28 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 20:49 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > On 2014-01-28 11:32, Svante Signell wrote: > >> nagios-plugins-contrib > > > > depends on libmemcached-dev -> builds fine now then the mach keyword > > is > > removed from gcc-4.8: schedule a rebuild! > > You are confusing "mach" (removed f

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-28 Thread Pino Toscano
On 2014-01-28 11:32, Svante Signell wrote: nagios-plugins-contrib depends on libmemcached-dev -> builds fine now then the mach keyword is removed from gcc-4.8: schedule a rebuild! You are confusing "mach" (removed from GCC's keywords) with __MACH__, which is what the libmemcached version in

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-28 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 00:36 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, ... > pdns PATH_MAX -> #... > privoxy build attempt 206 days ago -> builds fine now: reschedule > proxychains build attempt 246 days ago -> buildss fine now: reschedule > pyepr depends on libepr-api2-dev -> libepr-api2 (< 2.2-2+1

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-28 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 00:36 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, ... > The leaf packages to remove are: ... > evolution-ews > evolution-rss depends on evolution-dev->bogofilter: #729192 > gdb-arm-none-eabi built fine https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdb-arm-none-eabi&arch=hurd-i386&ve

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Mon 27 Jan 2014 11:04:47 +0100, a écrit : > On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 02:00 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:43:08AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > > > Maybe a way to avoid the (few) cases where linux/i386 is lagging behind > > > > (due to FTBFS) could be r

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-27 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 02:00 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:43:08AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > > Maybe a way to avoid the (few) cases where linux/i386 is lagging behind > > > (due to FTBFS) could be running it against amd64 as well, and not > > > considering t

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-26 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:43:08AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > Maybe a way to avoid the (few) cases where linux/i386 is lagging behind > > (due to FTBFS) could be running it against amd64 as well, and not > > considering the sources not appearing in both. Those are the ones which get dro

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-26 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, wow, thanks for looking through them! On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:30:54AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > On 2014-01-27 00:36, Michael Banck wrote: > Just few notes about some of the sources in the list: > > >e17 > > This was affected by a bug in edje, so it might be given back. > > >chocolate

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-26 Thread Pino Toscano
On 2014-01-27 00:36, Michael Banck wrote: attached is the output of a query against projectb. It shows hurd-i386 binary packages which used to build fine in the past, but which are outdated with respect to i386 (presumably the most uptodate, maybe I should switch to amd64) now. The following p

Re: Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Michael Banck, le Mon 27 Jan 2014 00:36:46 +0100, a écrit : > attached is the output of a query against projectb. It shows hurd-i386 > binary packages which used to build fine in the past, but which are > outdated with respect to i386 (presumably the most uptodate, maybe I > should switch to amd64

Outdated leaf packages to be removed

2014-01-26 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, attached is the output of a query against projectb. It shows hurd-i386 binary packages which used to build fine in the past, but which are outdated with respect to i386 (presumably the most uptodate, maybe I should switch to amd64) now. The following packages are leaf packages, i.e. packages