On Monday 03 December 2007 21:14, Raghesh A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have made a change in the installation script to format the ext2
> partition with block size 4096(-b 4096). Now its booting with a
> partition of size less than 500MB. Earlier we were getting the
> following error.
>
> "start /hurd/ex
Hi,
We have made a change in the installation script to format the ext2
partition with block size 4096(-b 4096). Now its booting with a
partition of size less than 500MB. Earlier we were getting the
following error.
"start /hurd/ext2fs.static: ext2fs: device:hd0s1: panic:
disk_cache_init: Block
Hello!
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:10:31PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> - On 11/29/07, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | A new gcc-4.2 (gcc-4.2_4.2.2-4) got uploaded yesterday, and is currently
> | building for hurd-i386.
> \--
>
> Where can I find the sources for the above?
>
>
I have a clean baseGNU/tarball with a working aptitude.
I plan to look at the disc sets over the next few days.
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
+64 3 488 2818Fax +64 3 488 2875Mobile 027 663 4453
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - personal
On Friday 30 November 2007 17:23, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> - On 11/29/07, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Are you using Debian sources for cross-compilation?
>
> \--
>
> I am using Debian Etch GNU/Linux+unstable+testing. But, are the Hurd
> gcc sources/patches are available
Hi,
- On 11/29/07, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Are you using Debian sources for cross-compilation?
\--
I am using Debian Etch GNU/Linux+unstable+testing. But, are the Hurd
gcc sources/patches are available from apt?
-
| If not, why does it
| matter?
\--
I don't have a Deb
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:10:31PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> Where can I find the sources for the above?
>
> I would like to test the same for cross-compilation as mentioned here:
> http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/hurd/building/cross-compiling/
> http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/hurd/building/cros
Hi,
- On 11/29/07, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| A new gcc-4.2 (gcc-4.2_4.2.2-4) got uploaded yesterday, and is currently
| building for hurd-i386.
\--
Where can I find the sources for the above?
I would like to test the same for cross-compilation as mentioned here:
http://www.b
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:25:53AM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> Okay, now frozen.
A new gcc-4.2 (gcc-4.2_4.2.2-4) got uploaded yesterday, and is currently
building for hurd-i386.
This is an important update as gcc-4.2 is now the default compiler and
this upload fixes static linking and adds crt
On Thursday 29 November 2007 17:06, Raghesh A wrote:
> Dear Philip,
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> We were able to reproduce the block size problem with a partition of
> 500 MB. Now we will change the block size to 4096 and test it out.
>
Good luck.
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbots
Dear Philip,
Thanks a lot.
We were able to reproduce the block size problem with a partition of
500 MB. Now we will change the block size to 4096 and test it out.
Regards,
Raghesh
On Nov 29, 2007 1:37 AM, Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2007 18:22, you wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2007 02:44, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:06:22AM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> > No sign of the new glibc and hurd packages yet. I will probably
> > create a little script to check daily.
>
> Oops. I did not upload them because I wanted to wait on K15
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:06:22AM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> No sign of the new glibc and hurd packages yet. I will probably create a
> little script to check daily.
Oops. I did not upload them because I wanted to wait on K15, not the
other way round. The new major glibc release has not s
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 13:16, Michael Banck wrote:
>
> Calicut have it easy because they use a shell script instead of
> binaries in an initrd, so it'd be a matter of search and replace (I
> pointed it out to one of them a while ago I think)
>
> Anyway, this is not a regression from K14 (or
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:51:06AM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2007 06:42, Michael Banck wrote:
> I am still working on the mkfs.ext2 block size problem. It is nasty as
> any solution involves working with the binaries in initrd. I now
> remember the problem from when
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 06:42, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 06:37:17PM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> > I will quietly work on the revisions and let everyone how I get on.
>
> I am not sure at which point of the K15 process you are at, but I think
> now would be a good time to
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 06:37:17PM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> I will quietly work on the revisions and let everyone how I get on.
I am not sure at which point of the K15 process you are at, but I think
now would be a good time to release it, unless you hit major issues.
We will update the cor
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 05:44:43PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> The true GNU snapshots will have a /usr->. symlink (or no /usr at
> all).
Actually neither is right I think. AIUI the idea is to have /usr unioned
into / , so the files can be put in separate locations, but are all
visible from
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:54:08AM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2007 15:17, Michael Banck wrote:
> >
> > 2. There is a /usr->. symlink, not a real /usr.
> >
> I need direction on this.
> 1. Is the / filesystem to remain as I have it?
> 2. is the /usr->. to be remo
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 15:17, Michael Banck wrote:
>
> 2. There is a /usr->. symlink, not a real /usr.
>
I need direction on this.
1. Is the / filesystem to remain as I have it?
2. is the /usr->. to be removed?
3. is the /usr filesystem to follow the Linux example?
Phil.
--
Philip
Hi,
Good to be back in business again.
I am suggesting that we join forces. Your Calicut team do the boot
floppies taking into account Michael Banck's first point about formatting
the hurd partition.
I will revise the tarball scripts to take into account Michael's two other
points. I w
On Nov 20, 2007 5:13 PM, Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If all goes well then K16 (or one of the Calicut L series) should be out
> before the end of the year.
Yes, Philip.
Please expect the rejoinder surprise from the Calicut L team.
CK Raju
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Thanks for this Michael,
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 15:17, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:43:22AM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> > This has turned out to be a tidy image and should not give any
> > problems.
>
> I tested it now on qemu and I found three minor issue:
>
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:43:22AM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> This has turned out to be a tidy image and should not give any problems.
I tested it now on qemu and I found three minor issue:
1. In the installer, the Hurd ext2 partitions are not created with -b
4096, so partitions s
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:43:22AM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> The K15 mini iso has been uploaded to gnuab.org. I have asked Guillem to
> move it into place.
Cool!
I will test this later today or tomorrow and report back.
I just uploaded aptitude, it should be available to mirror
The K15 mini iso has been uploaded to gnuab.org. I have asked Guillem to
move it into place.
The usual warning. GNU/Hurd is a developing os and people should take the
proper precautions when using this image.
The gnu*.tar.gz tarball can be found within the image as baseGNU.tgz
This has
26 matches
Mail list logo
