Re: Gnumach uploaded [was: Re: X.org uploaded]

2006-01-12 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:57:55AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:43:57AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Guillem Jover, le Thu 12 Jan 2006 01:20:08 +0200, a écrit : > > > Just uploaded a gnumach_20050801-3 package with fixes for the io access > > > > Now o

Re: Gnumach uploaded [was: Re: X.org uploaded]

2006-01-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:43:57AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hi, > > Guillem Jover, le Thu 12 Jan 2006 01:20:08 +0200, a écrit : > > Just uploaded a gnumach_20050801-3 package with fixes for the io access > > Now only the hurd package needs updated :) I'll do that tomorrow. Michael --

Re: Gnumach uploaded [was: Re: X.org uploaded]

2006-01-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Guillem Jover, le Thu 12 Jan 2006 01:20:08 +0200, a écrit : > Just uploaded a gnumach_20050801-3 package with fixes for the io access Now only the hurd package needs updated :) Regards, Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Gnumach uploaded [was: Re: X.org uploaded]

2006-01-11 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 08:11:36PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > thanks to the great work of Samuel Thibault we now have X.org packages > built from unmodified sources. I just uploaded xorg-x11_6.9.0.dfsg.1-3. > > However, if you rely on X, you might want to keep your xserver-xfree86 > packa