Hi,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:23:42AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Looks good. But is it really intentional, that this patch needs to be
> >applied on top of the previous one?...
> You lost me there, what gives that impression?
Well, just look at the patch you sen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:19:17PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
OK, attempt #2.
Looks good. But is it really intentional, that this patch needs to be
applied on top of the previous one?...
-antrik-
Olaf,
You lost me there, what gives that impression
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:19:17PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> OK, attempt #2.
Looks good. But is it really intentional, that this patch needs to be
applied on top of the previous one?...
-antrik-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Barry deFreese wrote:
> OK, attempt #2. Better or should I not use two var and use like
> DEB_EXTRA_CONFIGURE_FLAGS or some such?
Much better, yes. There is no policy about that, so maintainers have
full freedom about this. Try filing a bug, and the ntp maintainer will
adapt
Guillem Jover wrote:
Hey Barry,
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 17:27:10 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
build: config build-stamp
build-stamp: config.status
Given that the difference should be minimal it's better to set a
variable instead and use it on the configure argument line instead of
dupi
Hey Barry,
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 17:27:10 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Here is what I did to build ntp 4.2.2. Let me know what you think.
> @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> #!/usr/bin/make -f
>
> +DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH_OS)
> +
> include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
>
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Here is what I did to build ntp 4.2.2. Let me know what you think.
I believe the patch could be a little bit smaller.
> +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS),hurd)
> + ./configure CFLAGS='$(CFLAGS)' \
> + --prefix=/usr \
> + --enab
Hey folks,
Here is what I did to build ntp 4.2.2. Let me know what you think.
diff -urN ntpdate/ntp-4.2.2.p4+dfsg/debian/changelog
ntp/ntp-4.2.2.p4+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- ntpdate/ntp-4.2.2.p4+dfsg/debian/changelog 2007-04-10
16:29:14.0 +
+++ ntp/ntp-4.2.2.p4+dfsg/debian/change
8 matches
Mail list logo