Re: Debian GNU/Hurd TODO list

2014-05-02 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-02 09:34:38) > Justus Winter, le Fri 02 May 2014 09:28:39 +0200, a écrit : > > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-01 22:38:16) > > > (I didn't know they wanted ACPI so badly) > > > > Well, there is [0], a OS-independent reference implementation from > > Intel (we cou

Re: Debian GNU/Hurd TODO list

2014-05-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Justus Winter, le Fri 02 May 2014 09:28:39 +0200, a écrit : > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-01 22:38:16) > > (I didn't know they wanted ACPI so badly) > > Well, there is [0], a OS-independent reference implementation from > Intel (we could rip a GPLed version of this from the Linux kernel). >

Re: Debian GNU/Hurd TODO list

2014-05-02 Thread Justus Winter
Hi :) Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-01 22:38:16) > (I didn't know they wanted ACPI so badly) Well, there is [0], a OS-independent reference implementation from Intel (we could rip a GPLed version of this from the Linux kernel). 0: https://www.acpica.org/ Also, if it's only to power down the

Debian GNU/Hurd TODO list

2014-05-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, As suggested by Svante, I've moved our Debian GNU/Hurd TODO list on a separate page: https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/Hurd_TODO Now, again, it's a matter of making sure that debian-release, debian-boot, etc. put what they actually want (I didn't know they wanted ACPI so b