On 2015-05-06 10:44, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> [ with my m68k buildd maintainer and (ex-?) porter hat ]
>
> Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>
> >- debian-ports uses mini-dak instead of dak. It uses less resources and
> > brings some features that are useful for new architectures like
> > accepting binary
[ with my m68k buildd maintainer and (ex-?) porter hat ]
Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>- debian-ports uses mini-dak instead of dak. It uses less resources and
> brings some features that are useful for new architectures like
> accepting binary uploads when it "improves" the version even if it is
> no
[ With my debian-ports admin hat ]
On 2015-05-04 11:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum (2015-05-04):
> > I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
> > in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
> > other teams. I'm not entirely clea
+++ Samuel Thibault [2015-05-05 09:17 +0200]:
> * Getting binNMUs from d-release transitions
>
> This saves porters a lot of tedious work that would otherwise be just
> duplicated. We are not talking about fine-grain binNMUs here, but
> coarse-grain well-known planned binNMUs. Wanna-build supports
Richard Braun, le Tue 05 May 2015 12:27:10 +, a écrit :
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:36:57PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Given that the package coverage of the Hurd continuously increased and
> > that it just released 0.6 of its core components[1] along with releasing
> > Debian GNU
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 02:21:00PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
> Really?! So Hurd actually has a sufficient number of developers
> worldiwde?! And if Devuan is so welcome and Debian so hostile, more
> power to them, I just don;t know what are you waiting here and
> polluting our ML with toxic tone
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:36:57PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Given that the package coverage of the Hurd continuously increased and
> that it just released 0.6 of its core components[1] along with releasing
> Debian GNU/Hurd[2], this strikes me as an odd time to throw the Hurd off
> ftp
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> [Speaking for the debian-hurd team]
>
> Lucas Nussbaum, le Mon 04 May 2015 08:28:22 +0200, a écrit :
> > Maybe it's just about supporting and advertising debian-ports as
> > Debian's official way to host second-class architectures.
Am Montag, 20. April 2015, 00:22:08 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
> hurd-i386
> =
> Well before wheezy was released, we talked with the HURD porters, and
> they agreed to re-check their archive status just after the wheezy
> release[1]. The plan was to move the HURD port off ftp-master if it
> was
On 05/05/15 at 09:17 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> * Appearing on packages' and maintainers' PTS
> pages like http://buildd.debian.org/bash and
> https://buildd.debian.org/sthiba...@debian.org
>
> * Being considered as "second-class citizen"
Note that our developer dashboards (DDPO, Tracker, DM
[Speaking for the debian-hurd team]
Lucas Nussbaum, le Mon 04 May 2015 08:28:22 +0200, a écrit :
> Maybe it's just about supporting and advertising debian-ports as
> Debian's official way to host second-class architectures. Maybe
> there's more to it. What are the current downsides of moving hurd-
Joerg Jaspert, le Mon 04 May 2015 18:11:29 +0200, a écrit :
> On 13931 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > That pad says: "As a result of current state, d-ports cannot accept more
> > ports". If that's still true, it would make sense to postpone dropping
> > hurd and sparc until this is fixed.
On 13931 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> That pad says: "As a result of current state, d-ports cannot accept more
> ports". If that's still true, it would make sense to postpone dropping
> hurd and sparc until this is fixed...
Hurd is already on d-p, so hurd actually has double infrastructure
On 04/05/15 at 18:04 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Lucas Nussbaum (2015-05-04):
> >> I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
> >> in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
> >> other t
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum (2015-05-04):
>> I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
>> in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
>> other teams. I'm not entirely clear on the status of debian-po
Lucas Nussbaum (2015-05-04):
> I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
> in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
> other teams. I'm not entirely clear on the status of debian-ports.org,
> and of what the current downsides of using debian
On 20/04/15 at 00:22 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the jessie release approaches, the ftp-team have been reviewing the
> status of the architectures in unstable.
>
> Neither sparc nor hurd-i386 are going to release with jessie and we are
> therefore looking at their future in unstable.
Hello,
Joerg Jaspert, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 00:22:08 +0200, a écrit :
> hurd-i386
> =
> Well before wheezy was released, we talked with the HURD porters, and
> they agreed to re-check their archive status just after the wheezy
> release[1]. The plan was to move the HURD port off ftp-master if
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 14:38:17 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 14:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 14:24:34 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 13:55 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 13:49:
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 14:21 +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
>
> On 04/20/2015 01:49 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 12:50 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
...
> I for one am very
> grateful of all work Samuel and Justus put on Hurd and although I am a
> Linux user I have big sentimenta
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 14:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 14:24:34 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 13:55 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 13:49:37 +0200, a écrit :
> >
> > > > Well, Hurd is welcome to Devuan if s
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 14:24:34 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 13:55 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 13:49:37 +0200, a écrit :
>
> > > Well, Hurd is welcome to Devuan if sufficiently many developers commit
> > > their time to it.
> >
> >
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 13:55 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 13:49:37 +0200, a écrit :
> > Well, Hurd is welcome to Devuan if sufficiently many developers commit
> > their time to it.
>
> Which is the recurring issue. Be it Debian or Devuan doesn't change
> that.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/20/2015 01:49 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 12:50 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
>> Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2015-04-20 00:22:08)
>
>> I for one am tired of this discussion popping up each Debian
>> release, and I only had to
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 13:49:37 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 12:50 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
> > Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2015-04-20 00:22:08)
>
> > I for one am tired of this discussion popping up each Debian release,
> > and I only had to endure it twice now. Let's ditch
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 12:50 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
> Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2015-04-20 00:22:08)
> I for one am tired of this discussion popping up each Debian release,
> and I only had to endure it twice now. Let's ditch Debian in favor of
> a less hostile downstream distribution. I guess
Justus Winter, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 12:50:44 +0200, a écrit :
> Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2015-04-20 00:22:08)
> > We'll be removing HURD, as discussed, from the ftp-master archive after
> > the Jessie release.
>
> I never quite understood the benefit of removing the Hurd port from
> ftp-master. Anyon
Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2015-04-20 00:22:08)
> We'll be removing HURD, as discussed, from the ftp-master archive after
> the Jessie release.
I never quite understood the benefit of removing the Hurd port from
ftp-master. Anyone?
I for one am tired of this discussion popping up each Debian release
Hi,
As the jessie release approaches, the ftp-team have been reviewing the
status of the architectures in unstable.
Neither sparc nor hurd-i386 are going to release with jessie and we are
therefore looking at their future in unstable.
SPARC
=
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
29 matches
Mail list logo
