On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:11:21AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 12:55:06AM +0200, Marc Dequ??nes wrote:
> > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > 0 is a bad file descriptor?! Something is really broken. What makes you
> > > think the bug is in crosshurd?
> >
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 05:20:38PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Why not just create a category for the ports instead, call them BSD,
> GNU/Hurd and GNU/Linux (or go by kernel) where one can assign bugs
> accordingly? Seems far more flexible in the long run.
It would be better/consistent to ha
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:40:44PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >
> > The BTS tracks bugs per-package. When bugs are known or at least suspected
> > to be in a particular package, they're assigned in it. I don't find it
> > suitable to use particular packages as general place-holders. In this
At Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:03:40 +0200,
Robert Millan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:12:20PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >
> > This is definitely a new one. Looks like glibc breakage to me. But
> > if tzconfig works later on, it might be a more subtle problem.
> > Definitely worth taking
If what we actualy need is a BTS entry for the system in general
(e.g., gnu),
Debian GNU/Hurd isn't the GNU system, it is a variant.
this should be requested to the BTS admins (by using the BTS, of
course). Using the "general" virtual package.
Why not just create a category for the
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:12:20PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> This is definitely a new one. Looks like glibc breakage to me. But
> if tzconfig works later on, it might be a more subtle problem.
> Definitely worth taking a closer look.
>
> On the rant issue, I don't think there is anythi
At Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:19:14 +0200,
Robert Millan wrote:
> See http://bugs.debian.org/251561
This is definitely a new one. Looks like glibc breakage to me. But
if tzconfig works later on, it might be a more subtle problem.
Definitely worth taking a closer look.
On the rant issue, I don't think t
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:36:07PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>
> If you don't know where it is, then you have no right what so ever
> saying "don't come to me". Reporting it as a crosshurd bug is a good
> first step; if it ends up not being a crosshurd bug, then it can be
> reassigned. In f
[this will be my last message on this useless topic. One might wonder
what "who gives a damn where the bug is" means]
> So Robert, why do _YOU_ think the bug isn't in crosshurd eh?
> Seriously, who gives a damn where the bug is. It is a bug, hunt
> it down and kill it.
Actualy I do
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 05:54:54PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>> > Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a
>> > placeholder for
>>
>> I didn't. I was first sure it was crosshurd problem.
>
> It probobly is. Since it does work after the install was complete,
>
> > Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a
> > placeholder for
>
> I didn't. I was first sure it was crosshurd problem.
It probobly is. Since it does work after the install was complete,
and crosshurds job is to setup all translators.
So Robert, why do _YOU_ think
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:30:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:11:21AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a placeholder for
> > bugs that are in some other undetermined place. You should report these to
> > debian-hurd
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:55:32AM +0200, Marc Dequ??nes wrote:
>
> Coin,
>
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a placeholder for
>
> I didn't. I was first sure it was crosshurd problem.
> But, now, i really don't know if it i
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:11:21AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a placeholder for
> bugs that are in some other undetermined place. You should report these to
> debian-hurd so that the people actualy working on this port notice.
Well, ok. Bu
Coin,
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a placeholder for
I didn't. I was first sure it was crosshurd problem.
But, now, i really don't know if it it gnumach or crosshurd stuff.
> I'm adding the CC for you.
Thx
--
Marc DequÃne
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 12:55:06AM +0200, Marc Dequ??nes wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 0 is a bad file descriptor?! Something is really broken. What makes you
> > think the bug is in crosshurd?
>
> I'm not sure, so i'm asking u advice.
> Runing tzconfig after install co
16 matches
Mail list logo
