Re: Arbitrary Limits (was: Help in testing a patch for efax-gtk FTBFS on hurd)

2010-08-14 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, wrote: > > Originally the Hurd was meant to be binary compatible with BSD BTW; but > this is no longer relevant... > > That idea died so long ago the ashes aren't even visible. Thomas

Re: Arbitrary Limits (was: Help in testing a patch for efax-gtk FTBFS on hurd)

2010-08-13 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
On Monday 09 August 2010 22:55:31 olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > Originally the Hurd was meant to be binary compatible with BSD BTW; but > this is no longer relevant... There was a BSD Google Summer of Code project to achieve binary compatibility with Hurd translators, but it seems not have fail

Arbitrary Limits (was: Help in testing a patch for efax-gtk FTBFS on hurd)

2010-08-11 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:05:41PM +0100, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 23:52 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 08/06/10 23:41, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 23:37 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > >> Not really. The point is that the