On 15413 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Thats ok, end of May is a nice point to take.
Thanks for the work and the timeframe for the rest!
kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As
hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that all the 3 architectures
have now
On 15381 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It would be nice to have a bit more than 2 weeks to do all of that.
Ok. How much? Is 6 or 8 weeks better? I don't think, given how long this
is on the table already, it doesn't make much difference if its 2 or 8.
Just something thats clear defined and
On 15371 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and debug
On 15371 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It seems to exist there, so probably someone who can upload there and
> is interested in hurd-i386 goes and uploads stuff.
Within a two-week timeframe only?
(while everybody is supposed to be busy fixing RC bugs)
I just jumped over old threads - i
On 15370 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Today we had our regular FTPMaster meeting and discussed hurd and both
kfreebsd architecture and decided to remove them from unstable and
experimental 2 weeks from now.
Just before the Buster release? That's far from the easiest timing.
There is nev
Hi
back in August 2018 we discussed architecture inclusion into
unstable/experimental.
Today we had our regular FTPMaster meeting and discussed hurd and both
kfreebsd architecture and decided to remove them from unstable and
experimental 2 weeks from now.
--
bye, Joerg
The sun? That’s the hotte
On 13931 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> That pad says: "As a result of current state, d-ports cannot accept more
> ports". If that's still true, it would make sense to postpone dropping
> hurd and sparc until this is fixed...
Hurd is already on d-p, so hurd actually has double infrastructure
Hi,
As the jessie release approaches, the ftp-team have been reviewing the
status of the architectures in unstable.
Neither sparc nor hurd-i386 are going to release with jessie and we are
therefore looking at their future in unstable.
SPARC
=
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
>> with all the others (probably as a technology preview)...
>> So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie?
> If added as a 'technology preview', what does that mean exactly?
Note that the tech preview was a softening of a requirement to get added
to wheezy. Which didn
Hi
From our FTPMaster meeting 2011 minutes[1]:
--88---
- In a discussion with the Debian Hurd porters it was decided that the
Hurd port stays on FTPMaster until Wheezy is released. Should they
have managed to get the port into a state
On 12861 March 1977, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>There's a related question, which I just realised wasn't actually
>>explicit - does it make sense to add an architecture to testing at this
>>stage of the process which we don't think is releasable? My memory of
>>previous discussions is that the gener
On 12828 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> In any case I believe you need to be more aggressive on getting the
>> needed patched in the official archive.
> Right. I don't like stepping on other maintainers, but we'll probably
> have to.
Just to not have any wrong understandings here:
You MUS
Hi,
with the Lenny release upcoming we are thinking about larger changes to
the Debian archive, of which one point is "Clean up the supported
architecture list to free up space for new ones".
We had a few discussions during DebConf8 and came up with the following
rules:
- If an architecture fa
13 matches
Mail list logo
