Re: Debian Buster release to partially drop non-systemd support

2018-10-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Paul Wise writes: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:30 PM Martin Steigerwald wrote: >> As long as people choose to strip of dependencies to libsystemd from >> packages like util-linux, avoiding a fork would not work with how Debian >> and Debian based distributions are built. > > It might be feasible to

Re: Debian Buster release to partially drop non-systemd support

2018-10-16 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 14:48 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > The question is: Is > the package buggy if it does not contain an init script but a systemd > unit and it seems to be the case. Note that there are a *lot* of useful > options in a systemd unit that would need emulation to make properly >

mahler.debian.net: broken .builddrc resulting in bouncing mails

2016-02-29 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, mahler.d.n has a broken .builddrc resulting in bounces, see below. Ansgar Mail Delivery System writes: > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. This is a permanent error. The fo

remaining packages not rebuilt since May 2012

2013-07-05 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, there are still 8 binary packages[1] in the archive that were not rebuilt since May 2012 (when debian-ports was removed from the buildds[2]): suite_name |source | version +---+ unstable | atlas

Re: hurd-i386 qualification for Wheezy

2012-05-28 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Samuel Thibault writes: > - We are rebuiding the archive without debian-ports, it should be over > before the end of May. debian-ports now only contains packages helpful > for users; it is no longer used by the buildds since the archive > rebuild started. I keep track of packages that were n

Re: Builds for hurd-i386 using debian-ports.org

2012-04-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 04/20/2012 03:25 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Ansgar Burchardt, le Fri 20 Apr 2012 14:17:44 +0200, a écrit : >>> If the Debian maintainers were more responsive to bug reports wrt >>> GNU/Hurd the debian-ports archive would almost empty by now... >>> The problems a

Re: Builds for hurd-i386 using debian-ports.org

2012-04-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 04/20/2012 01:47 PM, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 12:45 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> Ansgar Burchardt, le Fri 20 Apr 2012 12:10:33 +0200, a écrit : >>> I do not find it acceptable for a port in the main archive to rely on >>> external packages, e

Builds for hurd-i386 using debian-ports.org

2012-04-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, I noticed that build logs for package on hurd-i386 also retrieve packages from an unofficial archive (debian-ports.org). For example the most recent build log for bash[1] lists these packages that seem not to originate from the official archive: bash_4.1-3+hurd.1 binutils_2.22-5+hurd.1 faker

Hurd and Wheezy

2012-04-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, in a recent interview[1] on planet.d.o Samuel said that the hurd people still would like to release with wheezy, but has anything be done on getting it at least into testing? In particular "the freeze itself is not the final deadline. Actually, freeze periods are rests for porters, because ma

Re: netdde_0.0.20120408-1_hurd-i386.changes REJECTED

2012-04-12 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Samuel Thibault writes: > I took 2.6.29 essentially because that's the version used by upstream > DDE, and thus what we know works best. Using linux-source would force > us to keep updating the DDE layer all the time, and not just when we > have time to spend on it... How often would that be? 2

perl [hurd-i386]: @INC has wrong order and missing paths

2010-07-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Samuel Thibault writes: > Ansgar Burchardt, le Fri 02 Jul 2010 12:57:10 +0900, a écrit : >> What does "perl -V" say about the value of @INC? > > @INC: > /usr/lib/perl/5.10 > /usr/share/perl/5.10 > /usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.1 > /usr/l