John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>On 05/02/2014 10:05 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> This needs to be addressed on d-i side; we need better support
>>> for the dpo 'unreleased' suite there.
>>
>> Sounds not very simple or clean.
>> How did you solved that on m68k then?
Not yet. I’m not a big friend
On 05/02/2014 09:10 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Helge Deller dixit:
>> Can such a package be uploaded to debian master ftp if I go through
>> the standard ITP process?
>
> No.
Ok, I assumed that.
>> If not, is there a way to make this happen on debian-ports somehow?
>
> Not in unstable, only
Helge Deller dixit:
>Can such a package be uploaded to debian master ftp if I go through
>the standard ITP process?
No.
>If not, is there a way to make this happen on debian-ports somehow?
Not in unstable, only in unreleased. We have the same problem
on m68k with e.g. bootloader packages.
Thi
Hello list,
maybe some can help me on this?
To be able to create a debian-install-cd two udeb packages (partman-palo and
palo-installer - both are related to the bootloader of the hppa architecture)
need to be in "unstable", since the debian-installer will not look in
unreleased and unstable a
Hello,
Svante Signell, le Thu 01 May 2014 22:26:12 +0200, a écrit :
> - rules.patch: Add support for hurd-i386 in architecture list
> - 0015_v8.patch: tools/gyp/v8.gyp: add platform-gnu.cc
> - 0016_gnu.patch: src/platform-gnu.cc: new file with platform specific code
It seeems fine, except
> +//
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-02 09:34:38)
> Justus Winter, le Fri 02 May 2014 09:28:39 +0200, a écrit :
> > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-01 22:38:16)
> > > (I didn't know they wanted ACPI so badly)
> >
> > Well, there is [0], a OS-independent reference implementation from
> > Intel (we cou
Justus Winter, le Fri 02 May 2014 09:28:39 +0200, a écrit :
> Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-01 22:38:16)
> > (I didn't know they wanted ACPI so badly)
>
> Well, there is [0], a OS-independent reference implementation from
> Intel (we could rip a GPLed version of this from the Linux kernel).
>
Hi :)
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-05-01 22:38:16)
> (I didn't know they wanted ACPI so badly)
Well, there is [0], a OS-independent reference implementation from
Intel (we could rip a GPLed version of this from the Linux kernel).
0: https://www.acpica.org/
Also, if it's only to power down the
8 matches
Mail list logo
