Sorry for the delay in posting the patch; I had a late night. Anyway,
here's the patch. I'll probably be able to run regression testing on my
spare machine in a few days. I also have a patch for gettext-0.16 coming.
--- src/gcc/config/i386/gnu.h 2007-07-14 17:02:14.21000 -0400
+++ /home/m
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 02:36:02PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> Looking at the buildd logs, it looks like gcc-4.2 is broken at the moment
> on Hurd,
Nah, it should compile fine giving enough patience. A reasonably
uptodate package is on ftp.debian.org mirrors, I just killed the build
Given that's the case, I finished making my patch (it was already based
off the debian sources - I couldn't get GCC to compile without those
patches), and I rebuilt GCC locally to make sure it worked properly with
and without profiling. I forgot to save a copy of gnu.h before I edited
it so I'm
Hi,
Is there still a reason for _pthread_mutex_lock() to be weak? This
poses problem when linking statically, because __mutex_lock_solid()
then doesn't pull _pthread_mutex_lock() (since it already has a weak
reference). The result is that on a stdio contention for instance,
flockfile()'s __mutex_l
Patches item #304048, was opened at 17/02/2007 01:27
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #407114: unixodbc: FTBFS on hurd-i386 & kfreebsd-i386
Category: None
Group: None
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
see bts
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:38:59AM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> It will take some time, I need to run GCC's regression tests before I'll
> submit a patch; I don't want to unintentionally break something. If you
> perfer I just submit a patch and not run regression testing, thats fine.
In g
It will take some time, I need to run GCC's regression tests before I'll
submit a patch; I don't want to unintentionally break something. If you
perfer I just submit a patch and not run regression testing, thats fine.
Michael
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hi,
Michael Casadevall
Hi,
Michael Casadevall, le Sat 14 Jul 2007 10:38:10 -0400, a écrit :
> After some trail and error as well as reading up how static binaries work
> and the difference between gcrt0 and gcrt1, I was able to fix the
> profiling bug with a GCC spec file:
Please submit a patch, yes.
Samuel
--
To
After some trail and error as well as reading up how static binaries work
and the difference between gcrt0 and gcrt1, I was able to fix the
profiling bug with a GCC spec file:
%rename startfile old_startfile
*startfile: %{!shared: %{!static: %{pg:gcrt0.o%s} %{!pg:%{p:gcrt0.o%s}
%{!p:crt1.o%s}
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 10:04:26PM +0800, k. bottle wrote:
> I am trying to compiling glibc-2.5 on Hurd but have not succeeded until now.
> I list my steps below and expect your help.
>
> (1) Install Hurd using Debian-k14-Hurd cd1.
>
> (2) apt-get libc0.3-dev and mig.
> and so update glibc to ver
I find there should be several patches by Thomas Schwinge, but where can I
get them?
I also read the "Building glibc 2.5 on Hurd" thread on bug-hurd, there seems
are several patches attached. Is there a complete patch or a complete list
of required patches?
On 7/16/07, k. bottle <[EMAIL PROTECTED
k. bottle wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compiling glibc-2.5 on Hurd but have not succeeded
until now.
I list my steps below and expect your help.
(1) Install Hurd using Debian-k14-Hurd cd1.
(2) apt-get libc0.3-dev and mig.
and so update glibc to version 2.5 and gcc to 4.1.3.
(3) Download l
Hi,
I am trying to compiling glibc-2.5 on Hurd but have not succeeded until now.
I list my steps below and expect your help.
(1) Install Hurd using Debian-k14-Hurd cd1.
(2) apt-get libc0.3-dev and mig.
and so update glibc to version 2.5 and gcc to 4.1.3.
(3) Download lastest glibc-2.5 tarball
13 matches
Mail list logo
