Hi!
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 00:35:09 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Source: gnumach
> > Source-Version: 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1
>
> >* New upstream CVS snapshot.
> > - debian/patches/41_io_unlock_ioremove.patch: Removed, merged upstream.
> > - debian/patches/42_disable_ioperm.p
Hello!
> From: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Source: gnumach
> Source-Version: 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1
>* New upstream CVS snapshot.
> - debian/patches/41_io_unlock_ioremove.patch: Removed, merged upstream.
> - debian/patches/42_disable_ioperm.patch: Likewise.
> - de
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 07:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421135: fixed in gnumach 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gnumach-dbg_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel,
override says libdevel.
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1_i386.deb: package says section is base,
override s
Accepted:
gnumach-dbg_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach-dbg_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1_i386.deb
gnumach-dev_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach-dev_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1_i386.deb
gnumach-udeb_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1_i386.udeb
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1.dsc
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526.orig.tar.gz
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1.diff.gz
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070526-1_i386.deb
gnumach-udeb_1.3.
6 matches
Mail list logo