Re: Fix for building ntp 4.2.2

2007-04-11 Thread Barry deFreese
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:19:17PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: OK, attempt #2. Looks good. But is it really intentional, that this patch needs to be applied on top of the previous one?... -antrik- Olaf, You lost me there, what gives that impression

Re: Fix for building ntp 4.2.2

2007-04-11 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:19:17PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: > OK, attempt #2. Looks good. But is it really intentional, that this patch needs to be applied on top of the previous one?... -antrik- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: Fix for building ntp 4.2.2

2007-04-11 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Barry deFreese wrote: > OK, attempt #2. Better or should I not use two var and use like > DEB_EXTRA_CONFIGURE_FLAGS or some such? Much better, yes. There is no policy about that, so maintainers have full freedom about this. Try filing a bug, and the ntp maintainer will adapt