Re: Toolchain TLS support

> glibc hasn't worked out of the box for atleast a year since > malloc/memusage.c uses __thread without #if's. Ok so glibc 2.4 as such doesn't work (that was the original question). glibc since 2.3 hasn't worked out of the box, either CVS or otherwise. Nor will the malloc/memusage.c t

Re: Toolchain TLS support

Alfred M. Szmidt, le Tue 05 Sep 2006 12:44:12 +0200, a écrit : >> As I said, these patches will become avaiable with time. But as >> such, both GCC and GLIBC work fine on GNU; you are of course free >> to inisist on otherwise if that makes you happy. > >By "as such", do you mean "

Re: Toolchain TLS support

> As I said, these patches will become avaiable with time. But as > such, both GCC and GLIBC work fine on GNU; you are of course free > to inisist on otherwise if that makes you happy. By "as such", do you mean "upstream glibc 2.4 release and gcc 4.1", or your patched versions? Th

Re: Toolchain TLS support

Alfred M. Szmidt, le Tue 05 Sep 2006 11:57:08 +0200, a écrit : > As I said, these patches will become avaiable with time. But as such, > both GCC and GLIBC work fine on GNU; you are of course free to inisist > on otherwise if that makes you happy. By "as such", do you mean "upstream glibc 2.4 rel

Re: Toolchain TLS support

As I said, these patches will become avaiable with time. But as such, both GCC and GLIBC work fine on GNU; you are of course free to inisist on otherwise if that makes you happy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Toolchain TLS support

On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:05:12AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >glibc 2.4 is completely unusable for GNU/Hurd at the moment, > > Not true. It might be true for Debian GNU/Hurd though. Wrong. It's also true for the glibc as it is in upstream's cvs repository. Period. If you have patches

Re: Toolchain TLS support

glibc 2.4 is completely unusable for GNU/Hurd at the moment, Not true. It might be true for Debian GNU/Hurd though. Also, a GCC 4.1-build glibc doesn't work correctly: it already fails during the building process, as soon as the newly created libc.so is being used (might also be ld.s

Re: Toolchain TLS support

[Cced to bug-hurd and hurd-devel.] Hello! For one part, this is essentally a repetition of ; everything in there still applies. For the other part, new issues are to be worked on, see below. On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:49:45AM

Re: glibc build-depends on gcc-4.0 on hurd-i386?

Hello! On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:47:16AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Is this a leftover, which can be changed to gcc-4.1 now? No, sadly a GCC 4.1-built glibc doesn't work so far. Regards, Thomas signature.asc Description: Digital signature

glibc build-depends on gcc-4.0 on hurd-i386?

Is this a leftover, which can be changed to gcc-4.1 now? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: K14 images.

Hello! On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:40:10PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote: > I am back again. Me too. :-) > Still no luck with the images. xorg still broken. xserver-xorg-core > missing - there may be other componants missing as well. Before a new image is to be released, at least