Hi.
Trying to startup my X server it says "cannot open keyboard"
Should I create some special device under /dev directory and or load any
module?
Thanks all.
This is my XFree86 log
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way. Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.
However, later it must still be obvious to figure out easily if a
committed change is an update from Linux-2.0.x, a backport from
e.g. Linux-2.2.x, or a Mach-specific change. The ChangeLog is not
always explicit there, at least IMHO.
Then I think we should take care to make them clea
Hi.
Emacs 21 in tty mode maps slanted faces to dimmed text, indipendently
from the terminal support for italic mode.
This patch maps -- if the terminal supports it -- slanted face to
italic fonts. With this patch, then, a properly configured Hurd
console can show italic fonts when in font-lock mo
[ CCed to bug-hurd. Please reply where it is appropriate. ]
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 04:08:05PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>You should put Linux's original files (i.e. the versions your patch
>is based on) into linux/src/ and put your modified files into
>linux/dev/. The files fro
Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
Hi all,
Hey,
[snip]
In addition I removed some "printk"- debugging.
Are you quite sure they weren't needed ? I know it might sound strange,
but when we first made the patch (I believe you based this on the
original patch posted by Gaël and I ?), we experienced a problem that
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gnumach-dbg_20050501-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says
libdevel.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Accepted:
gnumach-dbg_20050501-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach-dbg_20050501-1_i386.deb
gnumach-dev_20050501-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach-dev_20050501-1_i386.deb
gnumach_20050501-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach_20050501-1.diff.gz
gnumach_20050501-1.dsc
to poo
gnumach_20050501-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gnumach_20050501-1.dsc
gnumach_20050501.orig.tar.gz
gnumach_20050501-1.diff.gz
gnumach_20050501-1_i386.deb
gnumach-dbg_20050501-1_i386.deb
gnumach-dev_20050501-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your D
You should put Linux's original files (i.e. the versions your patch
is based on) into linux/src/ and put your modified files into
linux/dev/. The files from linux/dev/ will shadow the linux/src/
ones.
I disagree very strongly (and thus disagree with the comment in one of
the Makefiles
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:47:09PM +0200, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> [ SiS900 driver ]
> exploring the code where the patch went wrong led to minor changes in
> the eeprom (mac address-) reading function ...
>
> In addition I removed some "printk"- debugging.
..., so you changed Linux's source f
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:05:04AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > If someone is interrested and likes to further work on it, I can help
> > as far as my time and skills allow. For now I) have no ideas left.
>
> I'll add this patch to the debian package this weekend.
Is this still planned? Seems
Am 30.04.2005 um 04:58 schrieb Hiran Watson:
Yea, but the problem with having a patch is that some of us aren't
quite sure how to apply the patch. I suppose it's not too hard to
figure out, but is there any plan to apply the patch permanently so
that the stock kernel used in the base package has s
12 matches
Mail list logo
