Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have considered a "Debian port outside of Debian" a couple of years
> ago very carefully, for some reasons. And it is not an easy task, if
> you want to do it properly. There is a major difference between
> having a couple of extra packages on a s
Michael Morey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would very like to see the HURD more widely used,
> and may have an interest in getting involved as a
> developer.
Is there something you would like to work on?
Thanks,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:42:25 -0800 (PST)
Michael Morey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would very like to see the HURD more widely used,
> and may have an interest in getting involved as a
> developer.
>
> Michael
I would also like to (and will) participate in Debian GNU/Hurd.
My concern is movi
--- "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You didn't know that people start hacking on the
> Hurd because you are
> such a cutie pie?
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
I would very like
At Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:57:33 +0100,
Alfred M Szmidt wrote:
>
>That might not be a bad thing anyway, but it would be more work and
>a change.
>
> The work needed would be minimal, and I doubt you would need any
> changes. There has always been a seperate archive where Debian
> GNU/Hurd ha
You didn't know that people start hacking on the Hurd because you are
such a cutie pie?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>How about attracting new developers, porting packages, having
>something useful to work with for Hurd developers, etc?
>
> That hasn't happened in the several years I have been around here.
> People start hacking on the Hurd for other reasons
How about attracting new developers, porting packages, having
something useful to work with for Hurd developers, etc?
That hasn't happened in the several years I have been around here.
People start hacking on the Hurd for other reasons. And you know that
quite well...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While I agree with most of what you wrote, I don't think "progress"
> can be made within Debian, but what will happen is that things won't
> go broken. And that is a good thing.
How about attracting new developers, porting packages, having
somethi
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> But doing this because the bureaucracy wants it seems like a silly
>> reason to me. I am considering writing a new pfinet from scratch
>> because the current one really sucks, in my opinion. If we wa
Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But doing this because the bureaucracy wants it seems like a silly
> reason to me. I am considering writing a new pfinet from scratch
> because the current one really sucks, in my opinion. If we want
> firewall support it should be in the new pfinet, I
While I agree with most of what you wrote, I don't think "progress"
can be made within Debian, but what will happen is that things won't
go broken. And that is a good thing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:54:28PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Here's one fellow's interpretation of that requirement.
>
> Marco has advocated dropping 'doorstop architectures' from Debian for
> years and he is in no way authorative on this ma
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What Debian GNU/Hurd will be is Debian GNU/Linux + translator support,
> and a easy way for people to try the Hurd, without all the nice
> things. Debian is not interested in creating a new operating system.
That's fine. I'm not out here to say t
14 matches
Mail list logo
