Michael Banck wrote:
Please reply on-list next time if you want to get an answer.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:55:23AM +0900, Andre Caldas wrote:
2. Adding another partition will not help.
AIUI, the metadata gets mapped into the virtual adress space. Thus,
you can have more than one partition.
What
Please reply on-list next time if you want to get an answer.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:55:23AM +0900, Andre Caldas wrote:
> >>2. Adding another partition will not help.
> >
> >AIUI, the metadata gets mapped into the virtual adress space. Thus,
> >you can have more than one partition.
>
> Wha
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 07:01:19PM -0300, Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
> On Ter, 2004-07-27 at 11:37 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > No, the 2GB limit is a limitation of the Hurd's ext2fs translator,
> > not a Mach limitation.
>
> Are there any other filesystem translators avaiable? If any, do they
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:10:04AM +0900, Andre Caldas wrote:
> 1. Mach has nothing to do with it.
Indeed.
> 2. Adding another partition will not help.
AIUI, the metadata gets mapped into the virtual adress space. Thus, you
can have more than one partition.
Michael
Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
On 2004-07-27, Andre Caldas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've heard the problem is with Mach. And the "filesystem" is just a
translator that exists outside the Mach, right?
see the "The use in diskfs" part on:
http://kilobug.free.fr/hurd/pres-en/html/node11.html
Ah! Now
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:55:39PM +0900, Andre Caldas wrote:
> By the way, when I pressed "reply" on my e-mail client (thunderbird),
> it uses the "FROM" field as the reply address! Shouldn't it be
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You should press 'List reply' instead of 'reply' if you want to reply to
the ma
On Ter, 2004-07-27 at 11:37 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 03:27:08PM +0900, Andre Caldas wrote:
> > I've heard the problem is with Mach. And the "filesystem" is just a
> > translator that exists outside the Mach, right?
>
> No, the 2GB limit is a limitation of the Hurd's e
rafael ernesto alfaro sandoval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I installed the Debian GNU/Hurd in a 10 Gb partition, but I read in a
> mail list that hurd does not support partitions more big than 1 Gb, is
> this true?
It is partially true. Big partitions are supported, but big
filesystems are not
Patrick Strasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All your components share IRQ 5 or IRQ 11. Even worse, your NIC and
> your Radeon share IRQ 11.
> You cant try to disable some components in BIOS. You can also try to
> change the PCI-settings to let them use different interrupts.
If it can not be do
On 2004-07-27, Andre Caldas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've heard the problem is with Mach. And the "filesystem" is just a
> translator that exists outside the Mach, right?
see the "The use in diskfs" part on:
http://kilobug.free.fr/hurd/pres-en/html/node11.html
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 03:27:08PM +0900, Andre Caldas wrote:
> I've heard the problem is with Mach. And the "filesystem" is just a
> translator that exists outside the Mach, right?
No, the 2GB limit is a limitation of the Hurd's ext2fs translator, not a
Mach limitation.
Michael
arief# wrote:
Dear all,
> [...]
I dont have a working eth0 device.
In linux I use eepro100 as the driver, and I can see that this is
supported in gnumach. But nothing appears as eepro100 in /dev/klog.
Funny, I guess, so I take a few more ups and downs in the hurd.
Finally I get myself compiling gnu
Hello rafael!
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:30:47 -0600, you wrote:
> I installed the Debian GNU/Hurd in a 10 Gb partition, but I read that
> hurd does not support partitions more big than 1 Gb, is this true?
The default ext2fs translator of the GNU Hurd is limited to a bit less
than 2Gb (I use 1.9G
I've heard the problem is with Mach. And the "filesystem" is just a
translator that exists outside the Mach, right?
James William Dumay wrote:
I belive this only holds true for ext2 filesystems.
James
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 14:55 +0900, Andre Caldas wrote:
rafael ernesto alfaro sandoval wrote:
I i
Hello,
I have installed Debian Hurd and when booting the computer freezes. The
last part of the error message I get is:
rtl8139.c:v0.99B 4/7/98 Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/rtl8139.html
eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0xd400, IRQ 3, 00:e0:18:c6:sd:dd.
PCI latency timer (CFLT
I belive this only holds true for ext2 filesystems.
James
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 14:55 +0900, Andre Caldas wrote:
> rafael ernesto alfaro sandoval wrote:
> > I installed the Debian GNU/Hurd in a 10 Gb partition, but I read in a
> > mail list that hurd does not support partitions more big than 1 G
rafael ernesto alfaro sandoval wrote:
I installed the Debian GNU/Hurd in a 10 Gb partition, but I read in a
mail list that hurd does not support partitions more big than 1 Gb, is
this true?
I read Mach supports only 1 GB partitions. I don't know what happens if
you use a bigger partition. (I didn'
I installed the Debian GNU/Hurd in a 10 Gb partition, but I read that
hurd does not support partitions more big than 1 Gb, is this true?
I installed the Debian GNU/Hurd in a 10 Gb partition, but I read in a
mail list that hurd does not support partitions more big than 1 Gb, is
this true?
Thanks!!
Hello,
I can't find the list of the hardware supported by the Hurd in the
Debian pages, only those of Linux. This list exists for the Hurd?
Antonio Regidor García
__
Yahoo! lanza su nueva tecnología de búsquedas
¿te atreves a comparar
20 matches
Mail list logo
