On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:36:07PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>
> If you don't know where it is, then you have no right what so ever
> saying "don't come to me". Reporting it as a crosshurd bug is a good
> first step; if it ends up not being a crosshurd bug, then it can be
> reassigned. In f
[this will be my last message on this useless topic. One might wonder
what "who gives a damn where the bug is" means]
> So Robert, why do _YOU_ think the bug isn't in crosshurd eh?
> Seriously, who gives a damn where the bug is. It is a bug, hunt
> it down and kill it.
Actualy I do
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 05:54:54PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>> > Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a
>> > placeholder for
>>
>> I didn't. I was first sure it was crosshurd problem.
>
> It probobly is. Since it does work after the install was complete,
>
> > Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a
> > placeholder for
>
> I didn't. I was first sure it was crosshurd problem.
It probobly is. Since it does work after the install was complete,
and crosshurds job is to setup all translators.
So Robert, why do _YOU_ think
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:30:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:11:21AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a placeholder for
> > bugs that are in some other undetermined place. You should report these to
> > debian-hurd
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:55:32AM +0200, Marc Dequ??nes wrote:
>
> Coin,
>
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a placeholder for
>
> I didn't. I was first sure it was crosshurd problem.
> But, now, i really don't know if it i
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:11:21AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a placeholder for
> bugs that are in some other undetermined place. You should report these to
> debian-hurd so that the people actualy working on this port notice.
Well, ok. Bu
Coin,
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Generaly, you shouldn't use the crosshurd BTS entry as a placeholder for
I didn't. I was first sure it was crosshurd problem.
But, now, i really don't know if it it gnumach or crosshurd stuff.
> I'm adding the CC for you.
Thx
--
Marc DequÃne
-rwsr-sr-x1 root root 7828 Apr 28 11:23 X
The 's' is a 'stickybit', right?
No.
,[ (coreutils)What information is listed ]
| The permissions listed are similar to symbolic mode specifications
| (*note Symbolic Modes::). But `ls' combines multiple bits into th
9 matches
Mail list logo
