Re: libexec in glibc

2002-10-12 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > > > 1) What gets added to the FHS is not a Debian decision, > > 2) Debian released architectures need to conform to FHS, and > > 3) Ports still being worked on don't need to treat (2) as their top >

per lui, per lei, per gay

2002-10-12 Thread pingalfr
OGGETTO: Per lui, per lei, per gay Stiamo informando il popolo di internet italiano, che il nostro staff composto da giovani donne e giovani uomini dai 18 anni in su, hanno aperto un nuovissimo sito, esclusivamente in lingua italiana, e frequentato da persone italiane. Il nostro sito รจ il megl

Re: Some questions about the J2 CD.....

2002-10-12 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 05:46:49PM +1300, Philip Charles wrote: > > Another question > > Does HURD support partition larger than 2GB??? > > 1GB is the approximate limit. I should explain this a bit more. You can get up as much as 2gb if I heard other reports correctly. I am using 1.5gb toda

Re: libexec in glibc

2002-10-12 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > 1) What gets added to the FHS is not a Debian decision, > 2) Debian released architectures need to conform to FHS, and > 3) Ports still being worked on don't need to treat (2) as their top >priority, especially when they expect FHS will change

Re: libexec in glibc

2002-10-12 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to > > $(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to correct > > this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There should be no

Re: libexec in glibc

2002-10-12 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to > $(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to correct > this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There should be no > libexec dirs on Debian, so comply with the FHS). >

Re: libexec in glibc

2002-10-12 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > > > Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > The issues is that by Debian policy, all Debian ports must follow the > > > FHS. The same is true of the FreeBSD and NetBSD ports (I only noticed >