On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, [big5] Chu Roger wrote:
> I was just wondering
> Is the HURD installed from the J2 CD a libio-based
> system???
> Do I have to do the update mentioned in August 2002 if
> I installed HURD from the J2 CD???
No, this is a modern version.
> Another question
> Does HURD
I was just wondering
Is the HURD installed from the J2 CD a libio-based
system???
Do I have to do the update mentioned in August 2002 if
I installed HURD from the J2 CD???
Another question
Does HURD support partition larger than 2GB???
Thanks for your help!!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The issues is that by Debian policy, all Debian ports must follow the
> > FHS. The same is true of the FreeBSD and NetBSD ports (I only noticed
> > this because of the patch to support FreeBSD).
> >
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:51:25PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I didn't really follow the earlier discussions on this - Can you
> > remind me what mailing list it was on? The idea of libexec being in a
> > Hurd annex seems silly (and somethin
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I didn't really follow the earlier discussions on this - Can you
> remind me what mailing list it was on? The idea of libexec being in a
> Hurd annex seems silly (and something a committee would be unlikely to
> accept if we were storing anything other th
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:37:22PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> We need not change anything now in Hurd systems. We do not need to
> worry about matching aspects of policy that we expect to change by
> the time we actually release. And, we expect that FHS will have, by
> that time, a Hur
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The issues is that by Debian policy, all Debian ports must follow the
> FHS. The same is true of the FreeBSD and NetBSD ports (I only noticed
> this because of the patch to support FreeBSD).
>
> Certainly after */libexec is added into the FHS, we can add
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:37:55PM -0500, Larry Kaczrouske wrote:
> HI: Would you please tell me as to where do I go to get my 10 pices knife
> set that I won. I can't seem to find the page. Thank You
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we have a new o
HI: Would
you please tell me as to where do I go to get my 10 pices knife set that I
won. I can't seem to find the page. Thank
You
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---Outgoing mail is certified
Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:59:25PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> > Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
> > $(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to
> > correct this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There
> > should be no libexec dirs on Debian,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:47:22AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
> $(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to correct
> this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There should be no
> libexec dirs on Debian, so comp
FAI ATTENZIONE PERCHE' CON QUESTO SISTEMA GUADAGNI DAVVERO !
(se il messaggio vi e' arrivato piu volte scusate ma,
leggetelo
..)
Vorresti Davvero Guadagnare con Internet?
Bene, la prima cosa da fare è salvare su disco questa pagina per averla
a portata di mano anche se il tuo PC no
Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
$(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to correct
this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There should be no
libexec dirs on Debian, so comply with the FHS).
Any objections?
--
learning from failures is nic
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:09:54PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> - Port kerberos to the hurd.
>
> The last option would be the hardest, i dont know enough about kerberos to
> know if it would justify the effort right now.
It's definitely the right thing to do. I know that it is painful, and tha
Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see now that lsh-make-seed --sloppy works as a regular user, it only
> causes problems if you run it as root.
Then the situation has improved since I tried it (I wasn't logged in
as root, and experienced problems none-the-less). That's good to know.
On 11 Oct 2002 12:12:36 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) wrote:
> Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To compile them i had to --disable-kerberos support, for a proper deb
> > package there are a few ways to aproach it
>
> The lsh kerberos support is quite limited, and contained
Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I made some experimental lsd debs, they are at
> http://people.debian.org/~bug1/hurd/
Cool.
> To compile them i had to --disable-kerberos support, for a proper deb
> package there are a few ways to aproach it
The lsh kerberos support is quite limited,
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe someone wants to try out this compilation? If running the GNU/Hurd
> inside
> bochs under GNU/Linux is difficult, maybe it works better the other way
> round ;).
Hi Marcus,
I maintain the Bochs packages in Debian
I made some experimental lsd debs, they are at
http://people.debian.org/~bug1/hurd/
To compile them i had to --disable-kerberos support, for a proper deb
package there are a few ways to aproach it
- Special case the hurd build so it doesnt compile with kerberos support
and others do.
- Try and m
19 matches
Mail list logo
