Hi Marcus,
Sunday, June 16, 2002, 6:14:30 PM, you wrote:
>> kernel /boot/gnumach.gz root=hd0s2
>> -T typed ${root}
MB> Shouldn't this be "root=device:hd0s@" because of the "typed"?
This works, great! Hm, just looked at the installation guide and it
also says device:hd0sx... Don't know
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 10:30:58AM +0200, Daniel Borgmann wrote:
> kernel /boot/gnumach.gz root=hd0s2
> -T typed ${root}
Shouldn't this be "root=device:hd0s@" because of the "typed"?
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcus Brinkman
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 10:26:15PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > While porting util-linux i've found that in the Hurd there is no define
> > for TABDLY and TAB3 when including . I've looked the SUSv2 and
> > SUSv3 drafts and it mentions this
The scripts to build the J1 series of CD images are in their final stages
of development, however, a libstdc++3 problem has emerged.
I have discovered that 108 packages depend on libstdc++3, including apt,
rather than the newer libstdc++4. As debian-cd is very thorough in its
dependency checking
Is there a brave soul out there who feels like making sure that XFree
4.2 runs on hurd-i386? The experimental pre-release packages are at:
http://people.debian.org/~branden/.
Marcus has so far been doing the hurd-i386 porting work for X, but I
wanted to make sure others knew about it, in case som
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While porting util-linux i've found that in the Hurd there is no define
> for TABDLY and TAB3 when including . I've looked the SUSv2 and
> SUSv3 drafts and it mentions this two defines. Also XTABS is defined, but not
> mentioned in the drafts.
XTABS ca
6 matches
Mail list logo