Re: Debconf 2

2002-05-24 Thread James Morrison
--- "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is anyone going to Debconf 2? I'm planning my travel schedule for > July, and I need to decide. > > All of thug should be going, Jeff, Ryan, Simon, and myself. = James Morrison University of Waterloo Computer Science - Dig

Debconf 2

2002-05-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Is anyone going to Debconf 2? I'm planning my travel schedule for July, and I need to decide. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hotmail delete

2002-05-24 Thread Sheldon Crum
How do I delete my daughter's Hotmail address and create a new one so as to block the junk?

Re: Filing Hurd-porting patches in the BTS or upstream? (was: where do...)

2002-05-24 Thread David Schleef
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:36:07AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 05:03:44PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > > Ten years later, the GNU kernel doesn't even run on a SPARC.. ;) > > it could well never do, maybe when it's released we have Freedom CPU > already (http://www.f-cpu

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-24 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:12:59PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:03:10AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > "GNOME is the GNU desktop project, building a complete, free user-friendly > > desktop for GNU and GNU/Linux (and UNIX), so that all computer users have > > freedom

Buildd update

2002-05-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
A quick update: If you had noticed that non-us status reports were going to buildd.debian.org, but they weren't getting uploaded (You *are* all reading all the logs, aren't you?? *g*) I have fixed this. It seems the default setting in dupload.conf for "anonymous-non-us" isn't right. Enjoy. --

Re: [Patch #326] Hurd cannot be compiled with GCC 3.1 because of #pragma weak

2002-05-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:53:42AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > [...] having the a later version of GCC than the rest of Debian > brings us trouble. > See the build problems in Debian packages related to GCC 3.0. Fixing > them is not our job but we won't have them in untill Woody is > released.

Re: [Patch #326] Hurd cannot be compiled with GCC 3.1 because of #pragma weak

2002-05-24 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:50:20AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Patch #326 has been updated. > > Project: > Category: None > Status: Open > Summary: Hurd cannot be compiled with GCC 3.1 because of #pragma weak This is not the case, but always having the a later version of GCC than the rest

Re: Filing Hurd-porting patches in the BTS or upstream? (was: where do...)

2002-05-24 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 05:03:44PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 01:02:27PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > "5 years from now everyone will be running > > > > free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5" > > > > > > > > Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992 >

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-24 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:03:10AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > "GNOME is the GNU desktop project, building a complete, free user-friendly > desktop for GNU and GNU/Linux (and UNIX), so that all computer users have > freedom" > > I don't think that "GNU and GNU/Linux" was any ambigous in that sen

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-24 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:41:42PM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:24:57AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Could you point me to an article or interview in which RMS says "the > > > GNU/Hurd system" instead of