"B. Douglas Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah, but the Hurd servers are already built with cthreads
> which is wired right into gnumach. Any OS-critical program
> should rightly be built using the facilities provided by Mach,
cthreads isn't any more wired that our (ultimate) pthreads
imple
Ah, but the Hurd servers are already built with cthreads
which is wired right into gnumach. Any OS-critical program
should rightly be built using the facilities provided by Mach,
I think, unless that is to be somehow abstracted? My understanding
was that rather than a big monolithic kernel, the ide
"B. Douglas Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good deal. From what I was reading about pth and
> its support for pthreads, it is important to note that
> pth is non-preemptive. Apparently there is nothing
> in the pthread API that requires this, but some apps
> which expect this behavior may n
Good deal. From what I was reading about pth and
its support for pthreads, it is important to note that
pth is non-preemptive. Apparently there is nothing
in the pthread API that requires this, but some apps
which expect this behavior may not function correctly.
So this is not really an ideal repla
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 22:38:31 -0500
"B. Douglas Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Well, I ran all of the test apps and they appear to work.
>
I made a debian package of dmalloc recently, to do so i turned off support for
pthreads.
With it turned on it can debug pthreaded apps, maybe
Hi!
Well, I ran all of the test apps and they appear to work.
For my own test I compiled the web browser "Dillo"
which relies on pthreads extensively. Amazingly it
compiles and loads, but it appears to malfunction.
It gave an error about no "shmem" and loaded, but
would not follow any url's and cou
FROM: MRS. MARIAM ABACHA
C/O SHEWU ABACHA
LAGOS -
NIGERIA.
19TH FEB,2002
Fax: 234-1-759-0900
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATTN:PRESIDENT/CEO,
I am Mrs. Mariam Abacha, the widow of late Gen. Sani Abacha.
Former Nigeria military head of state who died mysteriouly as a
result of cardiac arres
Ok, I have enacted my changes and have created a
pretty decent patch for pth-1.4.1 which you can
get here:
http://www.geocities.com/doug_hilton/
I decided against posting it to the list as it was
around 8k when gzipped.
I have run minimal tests so far, but the pthread
test appears to be working.
Title: 제목 없음
여행가자
오픈 기념으로 회원 가입시 [태국,필리핀,사이판] 무료 해외 여행권을
드립니다.기간 : 2002년 2월18일 ~ 4월 30일 까지대상 : 여행가자
신규회원 가입자 전원증정 여행가자
홈페이지 바로가기
귀하의 승락없이 홍보성 전자 우편을 보내게 된 점 정중히 사과 드립니다.정보통신망이용촉진법 규정을 준수하여 광고메일임을 표시하였으며, 수신거부 장치를 마련하고 있습니다.귀하의 전자 우편 주소는 인터넷 상의
공개된 장소에서 습득하였으며, 저
Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Summary of problems:
> A) In some inlined functions, pointers where cast to void* before being
> assigned to a somestruct*. I wonder why the cast to void*? I admit that I
> didn't check what exact type they where before, but doesn't it work just the
Hello all!
I have made some more attempts to compile (not yet link!) the run-translater
using C++. In difference to what I said before, it is not just hurd, but also
other packages that prevent this, namely libc0.2 and gnumach. Therefore, I
won't just sit still and wait for pthreads.
Summary o
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This, I imagine will be a bit of good news :-)
I had to do some severely ugly hacking to get
configure past the well-known sigaltstack problem,
but once I was able to do this, I was able to
compile pth using the following configure switches:
./configure --with-mctx-mt
- Original Message -
From: "Marcus Brinkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Daniel Burrows" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [OT: the Jargon File and the Hurd]
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 10:20:44PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > I was just skimming
- Original Message -
From: "Marcus Brinkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Daniel Burrows" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [OT: the Jargon File and the Hurd]
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 10:20:44PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > I was just skimming
--- "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was just skimming the Jargon File, and found the following rather
> > amusing comment under "Linux":
> >
> > Linux is what GNU aimed to be, and it relies on the GNU toolset. But the
> > F
Hi,
Kimmo sent this to me by mistake.
--- Begin Message ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
> And I hope that nobody will check in those patches. I fully agree with you
> Thomas. Cluttering up the code with crap is pointless.
Me too. That is, I don't see the point in alteribg the
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 10:20:44PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I was just skimming the Jargon File, and found the following rather
> amusing comment under "Linux":
>
> Linux is what GNU aimed to be, and it relies on the GNU toolset. But the
> Free Software Foundation didn't produce the kernel
I was trying to get a pthread substitute going and tried
old pth. Apparently this has been done before and the
same problems - tests for sigstack and sigaltstack make
Hurd go out to lunch.
I think it will compile, and I am hacking configure.in
to try and disable these tests and go with the failsafe
18 matches
Mail list logo
