Re: Basics of packaging with the new workflow

2020-03-09 Thread Tong Sun
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 1:10 AM Anthony Fok wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 10:18 PM Tong Sun wrote: > > > > Hi Shengjing, > > > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 1:03 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > > > > > ...So when you create a new package with dh-make-golang, it creates two > > > branches for you, > >

Re: RFS: golang-github-tonistiigi-units

2020-03-09 Thread Tong Sun
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:03 AM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > Hi Tong, > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 2:03 AM Tong Sun > wrote: > > It is at: > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-tonistiigi-units > > It seems that you didn't quite push your changes yet :) Haha, indeed, I only pus

Re: undefined: proto.GoGoProtoPackageIsVersion3

2020-03-09 Thread Tong Sun
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:06 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > 1. you should regenerate the pb.go files, as these are not preferred source. Thanks Shengjing, The pb.go files should have been regenerated by the go:generate at https://github.com/tonistiigi/fsutil/blob/dac69f7f60df46c672470671a08245018ea1

Re: undefined: proto.GoGoProtoPackageIsVersion3

2020-03-09 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:48 PM Tong Sun wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:06 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > > 1. you should regenerate the pb.go files, as these are not preferred source. > > Thanks Shengjing, > > The pb.go files should have been regenerated by the go:generate at > https://github

Re: Basics of packaging with the new workflow

2020-03-09 Thread Martina Ferrari
Stephen, On 08/03/2020 00:43, Stephen Gelman wrote: > One small point about not using pristine-tar: today I tried to upload > backports of a number of packages packaged with the new workflow. All of the > uploads got rejected because of a mismatched tarball. The fix was pretty > easy - just

Re: RFS: golang-github-tonistiigi-units

2020-03-09 Thread Tong Sun
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:42 AM Tong Sun wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:03 AM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > > > Hi Tong, > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 2:03 AM Tong Sun > > wrote: > > > It is at: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-tonistiigi-units > > > > It seems t

Re: RFS: golang-github-tonistiigi-units

2020-03-09 Thread Tong Sun
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:37 PM Tong Sun wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:42 AM Tong Sun > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:03 AM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tong, > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 2:03 AM Tong Sun > > > wrote: > > > > It is at: > > > > > > > > https://s

Re: Basics of packaging with the new workflow

2020-03-09 Thread Stephen Gelman
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:13 AM Martina Ferrari wrote: > > Stephen, > > On 08/03/2020 00:43, Stephen Gelman wrote: > > > One small point about not using pristine-tar: today I tried to upload > > backports of a number of packages packaged with the new workflow. All of > > the uploads got reject

Re: RFS: golang-github-tonistiigi-units

2020-03-09 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi, On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:09 PM Tong Sun wrote: > > > > It seems that you didn't quite push your changes yet :) > > > > > > Haha, indeed, I only pushed to my > > > https://salsa.debian.org/suntong-guest/golang-github-tonistiigi-units > > > > > > and then forgot to follow through the rest of t

RFS: golang-github-tonistiigi-fsutil

2020-03-09 Thread Tong Sun
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:31 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > > While you're at it Utkarsh, please check out > > > golang-github-tonistiigi-fsutil at > > > https://salsa.debian.org/suntong-guest/golang-github-tonistiigi-fsutil > > ops, I meant > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-gith